From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:58986 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755747Ab0KVVcU (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2010 16:32:20 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 13:31:22 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Arend Van Spriel Cc: Zimny Lech , Stephen Rothwell , "linux-next@vger.kernel.org" , LKML , Brett Rudley , Henry Ptasinski , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for November 22 Message-ID: <20101122213122.GA2881@suse.de> References: <20101122134911.b7e106f9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20101122194643.GB21985@suse.de> <400C43189542CE41BC0A5B252FC90136952F05944A@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <400C43189542CE41BC0A5B252FC90136952F05944A@SJEXCHCCR02.corp.ad.broadcom.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:08:28PM -0800, Arend Van Spriel wrote: > Hi Greg, Stephen, > > The file wl_iw.c declare a struct semaphore variable and uses > semaphore function, but there is no explicit inclusion of > . I hit this problem last week when trying a > minimal kernel configuration for my development system. Normally we > build and test against kernel configuration similar to Ubuntu > configuration and we got the semaphore definitions for free. Expect a > patch soon. Ok, sounds good. greg k-h