From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwlagn: fix scan tx antenna setting on 5Ghz band
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:15:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101222131515.GA2242@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1292952108.3997.39.camel@wwguy-huron>
Hi Wey
> > > If its is 2.4, we need to use the correct tx antenna, I think we can
> > > remove this block of code all together since check already done above.
> > >
> > > if (priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band])
> > > scan_tx_antennas = priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band];
> >
> > Is correct to use all antennas on 5GHz when blutooth is enabled?
> > For me, more logical would be limiting to one antenna no matter of band,
> > since antennas are used anyway, only frequencies differ.
> >
> > For rx_ant, we do not check the band, only limit to first one
> > when bluetooth is used.
>
> there is no BT coex if 5GHz is used because there is not interference
> between 2.4 and 5GHz, so both antenna can be used. WiFi should operated
> in normal condition.
>
> For 2.4GHz, we also can use both antenna if there is not high traffic
> load on BT side.
>
> but you have a good catch, driver need to check band before use it
> (scan_tx_antenna[band])
So how about this patch (rfc only):
>From 26d0570ed5cd85097702d0fedb2c3f831dce9714 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:03:31 +0100
Subject: [RFC PATCH] iwlagn: fix scan tx antenna setting on 5Ghz band
Looks that we do not set correctly antennas when scanning
on 5Ghz band and when bluetooth is enabled, because
priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band] is only defined for
IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ.
To fix we check band before limiting antennas to first one.
This allow to remove hard coded cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band].
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c | 7 +------
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c | 9 +++------
drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h | 1 -
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c
index f4bec32..af505bc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-6000.c
@@ -596,12 +596,7 @@ struct iwl_cfg iwl6005_2bg_cfg = {
.need_dc_calib = true, \
.need_temp_offset_calib = true, \
.led_mode = IWL_LED_RF_STATE, \
- .adv_pm = true, \
- /* \
- *Due to bluetooth, we transmit 2.4 GHz probes \
- * only on antenna A \
- */ \
- .scan_tx_antennas[IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ] = ANT_A
+ .adv_pm = true \
struct iwl_cfg iwl6030_2agn_cfg = {
.name = "Intel(R) Centrino(R) Advanced-N 6230 AGN",
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
index 4bc82fc..322a2bd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-agn-lib.c
@@ -1492,15 +1492,12 @@ int iwlagn_request_scan(struct iwl_priv *priv, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
if (priv->cfg->scan_rx_antennas[band])
rx_ant = priv->cfg->scan_rx_antennas[band];
- if (priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band])
- scan_tx_antennas = priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band];
-
- if (priv->cfg->bt_params &&
+ if (band == IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ &&
+ priv->cfg->bt_params &&
priv->cfg->bt_params->advanced_bt_coexist &&
priv->bt_full_concurrent) {
/* operated as 1x1 in full concurrency mode */
- scan_tx_antennas = first_antenna(
- priv->cfg->scan_tx_antennas[band]);
+ scan_tx_antennas = first_antenna(scan_tx_antennas);
}
priv->scan_tx_ant[band] = iwl_toggle_tx_ant(priv, priv->scan_tx_ant[band],
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h
index f80685a..a347437 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-core.h
@@ -411,7 +411,6 @@ struct iwl_cfg {
const bool need_dc_calib; /* if used set to true */
const bool need_temp_offset_calib; /* if used set to true */
u8 scan_rx_antennas[IEEE80211_NUM_BANDS];
- u8 scan_tx_antennas[IEEE80211_NUM_BANDS];
enum iwl_led_mode led_mode;
const bool adv_pm;
const bool rx_with_siso_diversity;
--
1.7.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-22 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-20 17:05 [PATCH] iwlagn: fix scan tx antenna setting on 5Ghz band Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-20 18:13 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-12-21 12:05 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-21 17:21 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2010-12-22 13:15 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2010-12-22 16:57 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101222131515.GA2242@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).