From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:52303 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751218Ab0LVUPF (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:15:05 -0500 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:02:15 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] b43: Is this series still valid?? Message-ID: <20101222200215.GE10046@tuxdriver.com> References: <1293045092-12483-1-git-send-email-linville@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 08:20:18PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > 2010/12/22 John W. Linville : > > I found this old series pending in my queue from months ago.  I sat on > > them because they had some discussion and never got reposted. > > > > Looking closer, the discussion never amounted to a NAK.  So, I tried > > applying them, and they applied with only minor massaging. > > > > So, are these still valid? > > > > Let me know... > > The way we call init in one of patches may be incorrect, I'm not sure > if we still need to keep b_width (from other patch). I think it'll be > better to ignore that patches for now. OK, I'll drop them -- please repost if/when they are ready... John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.