From: Paul Fertser <fercerpav@gmail.com>
To: Bruno Randolf <br1@einfach.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"Thomas d'Otreppe" <tdotreppe@gmail.com>,
Richard Farina <sidhayn@gmail.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] cfg80211: report monitor interface channel via wext when possible
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 10:46:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110124074659.GD25136@home.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201101241010.38393.br1@einfach.org>
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 10:10:38AM +0900, Bruno Randolf wrote:
> On Sun January 23 2011 18:06:39 Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 03:11 +0300, Paul Fertser wrote:
> > > This makes it possible to retrieve the channel for the monitor interface
> > > in cases when it can be determined unambigously. Tested with ath5k.
> >
> > NAK.
> >
> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general/61860
>
> > I don't think so -- I don't recall anyone ever asking before ;-)
>
> I definetly want this functionality for my WLAN monitoring tool ("horst" -
> http://br1.einfach.org/horst).
You took the quote out of the context :), Johannes meant that nobody
has asked him how exactly he would like to see this functionality
implemented, and the in the linked mail he outlines his proposal.
Johannes, i know you're a busy man (no kidding, i understand you're
doing serious work) and users should trust maintainers on their
technical decisions, but i hope you can still spare a minute to
explain me why my proposed way to use set_channel is wrong (as i'm yet
to see any drawbacks). Working with real professionals like you is a
great opportunity for me to learn and i appreciate it a lot.
--
Be free, use free (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) software!
mailto:fercerpav@gmail.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-24 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-22 0:11 [RFC][PATCH] cfg80211: report monitor interface channel via wext when possible Paul Fertser
2011-01-23 9:06 ` Johannes Berg
2011-01-23 9:41 ` Paul Fertser
2011-01-24 11:47 ` Johannes Berg
2011-01-24 1:10 ` Bruno Randolf
2011-01-24 7:46 ` Paul Fertser [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110124074659.GD25136@home.lan \
--to=fercerpav@gmail.com \
--cc=br1@einfach.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maximlevitsky@gmail.com \
--cc=sidhayn@gmail.com \
--cc=tdotreppe@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).