From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@kernel.org" <stable@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwl3945: increase plcp check threshold
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 07:31:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110209063137.GD2184@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297180040.20613.39.camel@wwguy-ubuntu>
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 07:47:20AM -0800, wwguy wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 01:04 -0800, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > iwl3945: increase plcp check threshold
> >
> > Patch fixes:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654599
> >
> > Many users report very low speed problem on 3945 devices,
> > this patch fixes problem, but only for some of them.
> >
> > For unknown reason, sometimes after hw scanning, device is not able
> > to receive frames at high rate. Since plcp health check may request
> > hw scan to "reset radio", performance problem start to be observable
> > after update kernel to .35, where plcp check was introduced.
> >
> > Bug reporter confirmed that increase plcp check threshold fixed
> > problem for him.
> >
> > Reported-and-tested-by: SilvioTO <silviotoya@yahoo.it>
> > Cc: stable@kernel.org # 2.6.35+
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > Patch is oneliner, but does not apply on older kernel versions,
> > I will provide -stable patches when fix will land in mainline
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c
> > index 58213e7..27faa5e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-3945.c
> > @@ -2775,7 +2775,7 @@ static struct iwl_base_params iwl3945_base_params = {
> > .use_isr_legacy = true,
> > .led_compensation = 64,
> > .broken_powersave = true,
> > - .plcp_delta_threshold = IWL_MAX_PLCP_ERR_LONG_THRESHOLD_DEF,
> > + .plcp_delta_threshold = IWL_MAX_PLCP_ERR_THRESHOLD_MAX,
> > .wd_timeout = IWL_DEF_WD_TIMEOUT,
> > .max_event_log_size = 512,
> > .tx_power_by_driver = true,
>
> Do you see any help for 3945 with plcp checking at all?
Not really, I see only demage :-)
Ok, if we argree to remove plcp check from 3945 at all, I will
repost with slightly different patch for fix problem on stable.
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-09 6:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-08 9:04 [PATCH] iwl3945: increase plcp check threshold Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-02-08 15:47 ` wwguy
2011-02-09 6:31 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2011-02-09 7:46 ` [PATCH v2] iwl3945: remove plcp check Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-02-09 17:07 ` wwguy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110209063137.GD2184@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).