From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:37878 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751884Ab1BUVAa (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Feb 2011 16:00:30 -0500 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:48:00 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull request: bluetooth-next-2.6 2011-02-17 Message-ID: <20110221204759.GL9650@tuxdriver.com> References: <20110218135956.GA2256@joana> <20110221201645.GC2965@joana> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20110221201645.GC2965@joana> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 05:16:45PM -0300, Gustavo F. Padovan wrote: > Hi John, > > * Gustavo F. Padovan [2011-02-18 10:59:56 -0300]: > > > Hi John, > > > > Busy times at the Bluetooth subsystem. Here is another big set of patches > > intended to 2.6.39. ;) > > > > One of the changes is the end of the L2CAP and SCO kernel modules. We just > > merged them into the main bluetooth.ko module. It really never made sense to > > have them separated. > > > > Then we have firmware support to a new Atheros device by Bala Shanmugam. > > The First set of patches for Bluetooth Low Energy(LE) support, by Ville Tervo. > > Low Energy is a new Bluetooth radio that will bring many new use cases to the > > Bluetooth technology. Finally, LE connection update command support by Claudio > > Takahasi. The rest is just bugs fixes and cleanups. > > > > Please pull, or let me know any doubts you have. Thanks. > > I saw you had a merge conflict between bluetooth-2.6 and bluetooth-next-2.6 > and I want to apologize for the extra work I caused to you. It was all my > fault by not testing the merge of the my own trees. It won't happen again. ;) Cool, thanks! It wasn't a big deal, but better if I can avoid it! :-) John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.