From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Daniel Halperin <dhalperi@cs.washington.edu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Undefined TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iwlwifi: move rx handlers code to iwl-rx.c)
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 14:12:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110307131217.GA9571@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299489602.2308.1.camel@twins>
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 10:20:02AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 09:12 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> >
> > But perhaps we need a more generic fix in wait.h for the future. Maybe
> > we should decouple definitions of TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE and friends from
> > sched.h into separate header and include that header in wait.h as
> > well?
>
> No! That only makes the mess worse, the only sane option is to fix
> things so that wait.h can include sched.h and that is non-trivial.
I was not aware of recent discussion
http://marc.info/?t=129829886000004&r=1&w=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-07 13:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-04 16:51 [PATCH 1/3] iwlwifi: move rx handlers code to iwl-rx.c Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-03-04 16:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] iwlwifi: cleanup iwl_good_plcp_health Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-03-04 16:47 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-03-04 16:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] iwlwifi: avoid too frequent recover from statistics Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-03-04 16:46 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-03-04 16:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] iwlwifi: move rx handlers code to iwl-rx.c Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-03-06 21:34 ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-03-06 23:47 ` Daniel Halperin
2011-03-07 8:12 ` Undefined TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] iwlwifi: move rx handlers code to iwl-rx.c) Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-03-07 9:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-03-07 13:12 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110307131217.GA9571@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=dhalperi@cs.washington.edu \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).