From: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
To: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Subject: Re: [RFT] p54: implement multicast + arp req PS filter
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 03:34:21 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201104100334.22689.jcmvbkbc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201104100024.30155.chunkeey@googlemail.com>
> > In the ARP case, when there's no other traffic on p54spi, all ARP requests
> > are dropped. But if there's some egress traffic from p54spi, filter seems
> > to work correctly: only ARP requests that match filter pass through.
> "no other traffic" sounds like a the psm filter at work, have you disabled
> it before starting the experiment?
I ran tests first without "iwconfig wlan0 power on", rebooted and re-ran them with PSM.
Didn't notice any difference.
And having ingress traffic only doesn't help ARPs to get through. They need egress to get in.
In other words: I saw ingress packets in tcpdump, but no ARPs matching filter among them.
But once packets start to go out of p54spi, ARPs matching filter get in. Looks very strange.
> > In the multicast case filter seems to work correctly, but it treats broadcast
> > as subject to that filtering too. By default only 01:00:5e:00:00:01 gets into
> > priv->mc_maclist, so we miss all broadcasts.
> ok, so we have to reserve a spot of ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff.
But currently that cancels ARP filtering completely.
> > These two filters seem to interfere:
> > - if we set ARP filter and multicast filter without broadcast, we miss all
> > ARPs if there's no egress traffic;
> > - if we set ARP filter and multicast filter with broadcast, or don't set
> > multicast filter at all we get all ARPs.
> >
> > This effect does not depend on filter setup order.
> interesting, well a unnamed [but trustworthy] source told us that ST identified
> a problem with the arp/multicast filter some time ago, unfortunately I haven't
> seen any updated p54spi firmwares lately. Maybe this sagred stuff works?
"sagred stuff" ?
Thanks.
-- Max
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-09 23:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-01 22:58 [RFT] p54: implement multicast + arp req PS filter Christian Lamparter
2011-04-07 23:28 ` Max Filippov
2011-04-08 13:08 ` Christian Lamparter
2011-04-09 20:23 ` Max Filippov
2011-04-09 22:24 ` Christian Lamparter
2011-04-09 23:34 ` Max Filippov [this message]
2011-04-09 23:54 ` Christian Lamparter
2011-04-10 0:41 ` Max Filippov
2011-04-13 21:48 ` Max Filippov
2011-04-14 19:13 ` Christian Lamparter
2011-04-14 20:34 ` Max Filippov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201104100334.22689.jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--to=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).