From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
"George Kashperko" <george@znau.edu.ua>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Russell King" <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, "Michael Büsch" <mb@bu3sch.de>,
linuxdriverproject <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
"Andy Botting" <andy@andybotting.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"Larry Finger" <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH V3] axi: add AXI bus driver
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:14:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110412151453.GA20978@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=cG3U8yXaQ6PusmNaWcr+AWv3e_w@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 07:41:18AM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> > You can't do that, no static struct devices please. Make these dynamic
> > and everything will be fine. The -mm tree used to have a huge warning
> > if you ever tried to register a statically allocated struct, but that
> > didn't really work out, but would have saved you a lot of time here,
> > sorry.
> >
> > So dynamically allocate the structures and you will be fine.
>
> Well, I saw that along kernel, I had no idea there is anything wrong
> about this. It seems more ppl do not know about this:
> struct radeon_ib ibs[RADEON_IB_POOL_SIZE];
> struct radeon_pm_clock_info clock_info[8];
> struct radeon_pm_profile profiles[PM_PROFILE_MAX];
> struct radeon_surface_reg surface_regs[RADEON_GEM_MAX_SURFACES];
Are you sure these are all containing a 'struct device'?
> struct radeon_i2c_chan *i2c_bus[RADEON_MAX_I2C_BUS];
This is an array of pointers, that's fine.
> struct b43_key key[B43_NR_GROUP_KEYS * 2 + B43_NR_PAIRWISE_KEYS];
This contains a 'struct device'?
> struct ssb_device devices[SSB_MAX_NR_CORES];
> I guess I could fine more examples by simple grepping .h files.
Then all of the above should be fixed.
> Is there some guide around with things like this we should avoid?
Yes, do not statically allocate a 'struct device'.
> checkpatch does no catch this, so maybe just some manual? Could you
> point me to it?
It's a structure that has dynamic lifetime rules, you can't statically
allocate it safely. It's that simple.
Please fix this.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-12 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-11 21:25 [RFC][PATCH V3] axi: add AXI bus driver Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 21:06 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 21:19 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 21:25 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 21:36 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 21:56 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 22:12 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 22:36 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 22:45 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 23:35 ` Greg KH
2011-04-12 5:41 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-12 11:40 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-12 15:16 ` Greg KH
2011-04-12 15:14 ` Greg KH [this message]
2011-04-12 15:25 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-04-11 21:07 ` Greg KH
2011-04-11 23:44 ` Joe Perches
2011-04-12 5:52 ` Rafał Miłecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110412151453.GA20978@kroah.com \
--to=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=andy@andybotting.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
--cc=george@znau.edu.ua \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=rmk@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).