From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:32916 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755993Ab1DTUPl (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:15:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 16:11:24 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: "Guy, Wey-Yi" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: updated iwlwifi 5000 uCode available Message-ID: <20110420201124.GF2737@tuxdriver.com> References: <1303316696.14995.162.camel@wwguy-huron> <20110420182254.GE2737@tuxdriver.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20110420182254.GE2737@tuxdriver.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 02:22:54PM -0400, John W. Linville wrote: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 09:24:56AM -0700, Guy, Wey-Yi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Due to a packaging error, we've re-released the 5000 uCode version > > 8.83.5.1. > > > > The updated version of firmware is available for download from > > http://intellinuxwireless.org/?n=Downloads > > > > The old, wrongly packaged version has the following sha1sums: > > > > bff3bfce6a31ad94be32b4c204ff8819b0cd03fd > > iwlwifi-5000-ucode-8.83.5.1.tgz > > 8d94177b509be3fb653ce8ba0c633244e4abf5f3 > > iwlwifi-5000-ucode-8.83.5.1/iwlwifi-5000-5.ucode > > The version I get from: > > wget http://www.intellinuxwireless.org/iwlwifi/downloads/iwlwifi-5000-ucode-8.83.5.1.tgz > > matches the sha1sum values listed above for the "wrongly packaged" version. > > > The new version these: > > e70cc4b2249824a6b17ce9b9ae5087942c762213 > > iwlwifi-5000-ucode-8.83.5.1.tgz > > 22bf6093ed8204027cc3207c739d2cab9cc92ea3 > > iwlwifi-5000-ucode-8.83.5.1/iwlwifi-5000-5.ucode > > > > The only change is removing the advertising for multiple interface > > support which is not actually present in this microcode. > > > > Wey-Yi > > So, you are going to release a different version of the file but > with the _same_ release number? Couldn't you at least name it > iwlwifi-5000-ucode-8.83.5.1-1.tgz or something? BTW, this name suggestions sucks... 8.83.5.1.1 or 8.83.5.2 would be better for packaging purposes (at least for RPM). -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.