Re: [wireless-regdb] Update regulatory rules for Netherlands (NL)

Re: [wireless-regdb] Update regulatory rules for Netherlands (NL)

[Luis R. Rodriguez]

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Michael Green
<Michael.Green@atheros.com> wrote:
> Actually, is it okay to state that I have no opinion (meaning I don't object but I did not verify either).
>
> This case is not critical but others in future may fit this category too. So it would be good to be sure the expectation that Atheros (or myself) are not responsible to positively verify and "approve" every patch.    We of course are notified of all the suggested patches, which is fine.
>
> Reason is there are a category of changes (like this one) where Atheros need not be responsible to confirming accuracy (e.g. whether certain country's latest rules actually allow indoor or outdoor or require license or whatever). I mean items that are not in Atheros regdomain.xls that I don't track and that we don't use in our licensed sw.  I only want to verify changes that impact allowed channels, tx power and allowed modulations.  I will review all the proposed patches, but want an option to respond with "don’t care"  instead of "have reviewed and agree change is accurate and should be made".
>
> Let me know what you think.


John,

Michael is indifferent to this change, above is his description. How
would you like him to explicitly state this next time?

  Luis


>
>
> Michael Green
> Atheros Communications, Inc.
> mgreen@atheros.com
> Desk:   +1-781-400-1491
> Mobile: +1-508-380-4921
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Luis R. Rodriguez [mailto:mcgrof@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 1:20 PM
> To: Michael Green
> Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] Update regulatory rules for Netherlands (NL)
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Michael Green <Michael.Green@atheros.com> wrote:
>> Okay, I have no opinion on this change.
>
> Should I state that this is:
>
> Acked-by: Michael Green <Michael.Green@atheros.com>
>
> In other words, you've reviewed it, and are OK with it?
>
>  Luis
>

Re: [wireless-regdb] Update regulatory rules for Netherlands (NL)

[John W. Linville]

A "no objection" reply would be most welcome.

Thanks,

John

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:55:11AM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Michael Green
> <Michael.Green@atheros.com> wrote:
> > Actually, is it okay to state that I have no opinion (meaning I don't object but I did not verify either).
> >
> > This case is not critical but others in future may fit this category too. So it would be good to be sure the expectation that Atheros (or myself) are not responsible to positively verify and "approve" every patch.    We of course are notified of all the suggested patches, which is fine.
> >
> > Reason is there are a category of changes (like this one) where Atheros need not be responsible to confirming accuracy (e.g. whether certain country's latest rules actually allow indoor or outdoor or require license or whatever). I mean items that are not in Atheros regdomain.xls that I don't track and that we don't use in our licensed sw.  I only want to verify changes that impact allowed channels, tx power and allowed modulations.  I will review all the proposed patches, but want an option to respond with "don’t care"  instead of "have reviewed and agree change is accurate and should be made".
> >
> > Let me know what you think.
> 
> 
> John,
> 
> Michael is indifferent to this change, above is his description. How
> would you like him to explicitly state this next time?
> 
>   Luis
> 
> 
> >
> >
> > Michael Green
> > Atheros Communications, Inc.
> > mgreen@atheros.com
> > Desk:   +1-781-400-1491
> > Mobile: +1-508-380-4921
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Luis R. Rodriguez [mailto:mcgrof@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 25, 2011 1:20 PM
> > To: Michael Green
> > Subject: Re: [wireless-regdb] Update regulatory rules for Netherlands (NL)
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Michael Green <Michael.Green@atheros.com> wrote:
> >> Okay, I have no opinion on this change.
> >
> > Should I state that this is:
> >
> > Acked-by: Michael Green <Michael.Green@atheros.com>
> >
> > In other words, you've reviewed it, and are OK with it?
> >
> >  Luis
> >
> 

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.

Re: [wireless-regdb] Update regulatory rules for Netherlands (NL)

[Luis R. Rodriguez]

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 12:33 PM, John W. Linville
<linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> A "no objection" reply would be most welcome.

OK - no objection then :)

 Luis