From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Wey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@linux.intel.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-2.6] iwlagn: fix "Received BA when not expected"
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:59:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110428115947.GB7030@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1303990661.3558.3.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:37:41PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 13:10 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > Need to use broadcast sta_id for management and multicast frames,
> > otherwise we broke BA session and get messages like that:
> >
> > "Received BA when not expected"
> >
> > or (on older kernels):
> >
> > "BA scd_flow 0 does not match txq_id 10"
>
> Hmm. Interesting. I believe you, but it's hard.
To be honest, I expected to get explanations from you (perhaps
with better fix) :-) However this one is intended to work on older
kernels, and is tested by me and one other user.
> > - /* Find index into station table for destination station */
> > - sta_id = iwl_sta_id_or_broadcast(priv, ctx, info->control.sta);
>
> info->control.sta should be NULL here, at least for multicast frames
> (which never really happen in practise unless you use AP mode). And then
> this should return ctx->bcast_sta_id, just like you use below:
>
> > + /* If this frame is broadcast or management, use broadcast station id */
> > + if (!ieee80211_is_data(fc) || is_multicast_ether_addr(hdr->addr1))
> > + sta_id = ctx->bcast_sta_id;
>
> So the reason has to be management frames. But why would those be
> affecting it? They aren't QoS frames, so there should be no influence on
> BA handling at all. This is a bit odd.
>
>
> Maybe we should make it clear here that it's about non-data frames and
> remove the multicast check since that ought to be handled in the other
> path?
We call iwl_sta_modify_sleep_tx_count(priv, sta_id, 1); for any frame
as long as some other conditions are true.
Also multicast frames are important. When we send data and multicast
frame we probably modify
priv->stations[sta_id].tid[tid]
with wrong sta_id (other station with unicast address), what make related
aggregation data wrong for that other station.
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-28 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-28 11:10 [PATCH wireless-2.6] iwlagn: fix "Received BA when not expected" Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-04-28 11:37 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-28 11:41 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-28 11:59 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2011-04-28 12:09 ` Johannes Berg
2011-04-29 13:57 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110428115947.GB7030@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).