Re: [PATCH 2/2] brcm80211: Fix for suspend/resume bug

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 03:41:50PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 05/03/2011 03:17 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> >On 05/03/2011 03:11 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 03:09:20PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> >>>On 05/03/2011 03:00 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>>>On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 02:33:44PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> >>>>>On 05/03/2011 02:15 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >>>>>>On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:00:57AM -0700, sukeshs@broadcom.com wrote:
> >>>>>>>   #if defined(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>+extern volatile bool dhd_mmc_suspend;
> >>>>>>This does not do what you think it does.
> >>>>>Hi Greg,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>I posted the 'catchup' patch set and I rebased it on '[PATCH 1/2]
> >>>>>brcm80211: FIX for TKIP GTK bug' from Sukesh. The only other two
> >>>>>patches I saw on the linuxdriver list are:
> >>>>You rebased on a 1/2 patch in a series with an invalid 0/2 email?
> >>>>
> >>>>{sigh}
> >>>Sorry.
> >>>>I dropped that patch as the whole series needed to be resent, do you
> >>>>want me to apply that one patch before yours?
> >>>I can resend my series if that is more convenient for you.
> >>Please, but just send it to me, I doubt everyone wants to see 60+
> >>patches again on the list.
> >Ok. Just for this time I will agree to break the rules ;-)
> 
> Hi Greg,
> 
> I rebase and regenerated the patch files. Did a diff before
> resending them with the previous set and there are no relevant
> differences so the patches I sent this morning are ok.

Great, I've applied them all now.

greg k-h