From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:59406 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751299Ab1ECTtn (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 May 2011 15:49:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 3 May 2011 12:46:49 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Arend van Spriel Cc: Greg KH , "devel@linuxdriverproject.org" , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Sukesh Srikakula Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] brcm80211: Fix for suspend/resume bug Message-ID: <20110503194649.GA6322@kroah.com> (sfid-20110503_214946_431148_9CFA64C3) References: <1304406057-8722-1-git-send-email-sukeshs@broadcom.com> <1304406057-8722-3-git-send-email-sukeshs@broadcom.com> <20110503121522.GB22674@suse.de> <4DBFF628.6040502@broadcom.com> <20110503130049.GA29438@suse.de> <4DBFFE80.3030305@broadcom.com> <20110503131157.GA29915@suse.de> <4DC00050.5000009@broadcom.com> <4DC0061E.8020504@broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4DC0061E.8020504@broadcom.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 03:41:50PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 05/03/2011 03:17 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: > >On 05/03/2011 03:11 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >>On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 03:09:20PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: > >>>On 05/03/2011 03:00 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >>>>On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 02:33:44PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: > >>>>>On 05/03/2011 02:15 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >>>>>>On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 12:00:57AM -0700, sukeshs@broadcom.com wrote: > >>>>>>> #if defined(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>+extern volatile bool dhd_mmc_suspend; > >>>>>>This does not do what you think it does. > >>>>>Hi Greg, > >>>>> > >>>>>I posted the 'catchup' patch set and I rebased it on '[PATCH 1/2] > >>>>>brcm80211: FIX for TKIP GTK bug' from Sukesh. The only other two > >>>>>patches I saw on the linuxdriver list are: > >>>>You rebased on a 1/2 patch in a series with an invalid 0/2 email? > >>>> > >>>>{sigh} > >>>Sorry. > >>>>I dropped that patch as the whole series needed to be resent, do you > >>>>want me to apply that one patch before yours? > >>>I can resend my series if that is more convenient for you. > >>Please, but just send it to me, I doubt everyone wants to see 60+ > >>patches again on the list. > >Ok. Just for this time I will agree to break the rules ;-) > > Hi Greg, > > I rebase and regenerated the patch files. Did a diff before > resending them with the previous set and there are no relevant > differences so the patches I sent this morning are ok. Great, I've applied them all now. greg k-h