From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:50801 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756201Ab1EXOcV (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 10:32:21 -0400 Received: by fxm17 with SMTP id 17so4693677fxm.19 for ; Tue, 24 May 2011 07:32:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Helmut Schaa To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Subject: Re: Initial automatic channel selection implementation Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 16:27:48 +0200 Cc: "linux-wireless" , hostap@lists.shmoo.com, Matt Smith References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <201105241627.49201.helmut.schaa@googlemail.com> (sfid-20110524_163225_189132_C6E34701) Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Luis, Am Dienstag, 24. Mai 2011 schrieb Luis R. Rodriguez: > II - Load check: > > * In addition to the above take into consideration some metric for > load on the channel: frame count observed Sounds similar to the busy time information some drivers already report via "iw wlan0 survey dump", no? Counting frames sounds like a lot of overhead to me. Helmut