From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:14148 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757134Ab1EYNLt (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 May 2011 09:11:49 -0400 Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 15:11:32 +0200 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Paul Bolle Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [iwl4965] Microcode SW error detected Message-ID: <20110525131130.GA3260@redhat.com> (sfid-20110525_151152_377180_68834ABE) References: <1306151106.2066.60.camel@x61.thuisdomein> <20110524070941.GA2189@redhat.com> <1306255853.12267.14.camel@x61.thuisdomein> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1306255853.12267.14.camel@x61.thuisdomein> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:50:53PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 09:09 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > What is your configuration (mode, > > encryption, do you use wpa_supplicant or NetworkManager, which version, > > etc ...)? > > 0) Mode as is displayed in iwconfig output? That is "Managed". > > 1) Encryption is wep (so, no wpa_supplicant). > > 2) Currently using NetworkManager-0.8.4-1.fc14.x86_64. I try to use WEP with one AP, no microcode errors. However with different NetworkManager version, not sure if it is important. I'll try lately on F-14. What channel do you use? Is network 11n or 11g or mixed ? WEP is 40 bits or other? > > I will try to reproduce locally. If I'll be not able to reproduce, > > I'll ask you for debug logs on broken, and working (i.e. 2.6.38) version > > for compare. > > 3) Sure, no problem. But isn't 2.6.38 from before the iwlegacy split? Yes, it is. If the problem was introduced during driver split (that happen in 2.6.39), one way to find a fix would be compare driver behaviour before the split and after. Stanislaw