linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Ivo Van Doorn <ivdoorn@gmail.com>
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>,
	Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>,
	Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-2.6] rt2x00: fix rmmod crash
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 11:32:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110531093201.GA15266@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinABm=J0eZnwAjkYPwA1e3AgoFW6Q@mail.gmail.com>

Hello

On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 08:25:37PM +0200, Ivo Van Doorn wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl> wrote:
> > Do not destroy workqueue, which still can be used by autowakeup_work,
> > before ieee80211_unregister_hw() is called.
> 
> Well isn't the bug then that autowakeup_work isn't cancelled using
> cancel_work_sync
> like the other workqueue tasks?
> 
> I rather add the call to cancel_work_sync then moving the killing of
> the workqueue.
> The position where the workqueue is destroyed should be the place
> where we cancel
> all scheduled work, that way we can assume no rt2x00-related threads ater this
> position.

rt2x00lib_config() could be running simultaneously to rt2x00lib_remove_dev()
and queue just canceled autowake_work again into (just destroyed) workqueue.
Other solution to fix, would be use ieee80211_queue_work() instead of custom
workqueue, is that better?

Stanislaw

  reply	other threads:[~2011-05-31  9:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-05-29 10:45 [PATCH wireless-2.6] rt2x00: fix rmmod crash Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-05-29 16:48 ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2011-05-29 20:42   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-05-30  6:24     ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2011-05-30  9:52       ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-05-30 11:26         ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2011-05-30 12:52           ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-05-30 13:42             ` Gertjan van Wingerde
2011-05-30 18:25 ` Ivo Van Doorn
2011-05-31  9:32   ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2011-06-02 17:23     ` Ivo Van Doorn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110531093201.GA15266@redhat.com \
    --to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=gwingerde@gmail.com \
    --cc=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
    --cc=ivdoorn@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stf_xl@wp.pl \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).