From: "Henry Ptasinski" <henryp@broadcom.com>
To: "Julian Calaby" <julian.calaby@gmail.com>
Cc: "Greg Dietsche" <gregory.dietsche@cuw.edu>,
"gregkh@suse.de" <gregkh@suse.de>,
"Brett Rudley" <brudley@broadcom.com>,
"Dowan Kim" <dowan@broadcom.com>,
"Roland Vossen" <rvossen@broadcom.com>,
"Arend Van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"devel@driverdev.osuosl.org" <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Henry Ptasinski" <henryp@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: brcm80211: return false if not a broadcom board
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:01:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110617220108.GH3801@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=tLWXn7mMf-6pf-3gM6x8zX=WNtw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 04:45:21PM -0700, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Henry,
>
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 09:37, Henry Ptasinski <henryp@broadcom.com> wrote:
> > How's this for a somewhat clearer implementation:
> >
> > static bool brcms_c_validboardtype(struct brcms_c_hw_info *wlc_hw)
> > {
> > bool goodboard = true;
> > uint boardrev = wlc_hw->boardrev;
> >
> > if (wlc_hw->sih->boardvendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM) {
>
> You could reduce indentation by having this be:
>
> if (wlc_hw->sih->boardvendor != PCI_VENDOR_ID_BROADCOM)
> return true;
>
> > /* validate boardrev */
> > if (boardrev == 0)
> > goodboard = false;
>
> and remove the goodboard variable by having this return false immediately.
>
> > else if (boardrev > 0xff) {
>
> You could also drop the else and have this as
>
> if (boardrev <= 0xff)
> return true;
>
> > /* 4 bits each for board type, major, minor, and tiny
> > version numbers */
> > uint brt = (boardrev & 0xf000) >> 12;
> > uint b0 = (boardrev & 0xf00) >> 8;
> > uint b1 = (boardrev & 0xf0) >> 4;
> > uint b2 = boardrev & 0xf;
> >
> > if ((brt > 2) || (brt == 0) || (b0 > 9) || (b0 == 0)
> > || (b1 > 9) || (b2 > 9))
> > goodboard = false;
>
> and return false here too.
>
> > }
> > }
> >
> > return goodboard;
>
> then just return true here.
>
> > }
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Julian Calaby
Yea, it's a lot flatter with those changes. Look for it in a patch set
relatively soon ...
- Henry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-17 22:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-15 22:25 [PATCH] staging: brcm80211: return false if not a broadcom board Greg Dietsche
2011-06-16 1:36 ` Henry Ptasinski
2011-06-16 2:49 ` Greg Dietsche
2011-06-16 23:37 ` Henry Ptasinski
2011-06-16 23:45 ` Julian Calaby
2011-06-17 22:01 ` Henry Ptasinski [this message]
2011-06-18 15:52 ` Greg Dietsche
2011-06-16 5:14 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110617220108.GH3801@broadcom.com \
--to=henryp@broadcom.com \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=brudley@broadcom.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=dowan@broadcom.com \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=gregory.dietsche@cuw.edu \
--cc=julian.calaby@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rvossen@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).