linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Henry Ptasinski" <henryp@broadcom.com>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: "linville@tuxdriver.com" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	"gregkh@suse.de" <gregkh@suse.de>,
	"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Brett Rudley" <brudley@broadcom.com>,
	"Arend Van Spriel" <arend@broadcom.com>,
	"Roland Vossen" <rvossen@broadcom.com>,
	"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@broadcom.com>,
	"Henry Ptasinski" <henryp@broadcom.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Move brcm80211 to mainline
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 14:21:49 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110707212149.GR23944@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACna6rx5EyZ-=2XgWawdN_Qu2t1K1sdHZydZFW6=TiX2QUwMfw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 05:40:13PM -0700, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2011/7/7 Henry Ptasinski <henryp@broadcom.com>:
> > With the latest series of cleanup patches merged in by Greg KH, I'd like to
> > now propose moving brcm80211 out of staging and into mainline.
> >
> > Since brcm80211 in staging-next has about ~250 patches that areen't in
> > wireless-testing yet, I've put together a patch to add a copy of the
> > current sources from staging-next into
> > wireless-testing:drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211.
> >
> > The patch is somewhat large, so I've posted the patch at:
> >
> >      
> >  http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/brcm80211?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=0001-wireless-testing-add-brcm80211.patch
> >
> > Only the necessary Kconfig and Makefile adjustments have been made (the
> > sources are unchanged from what's currently in staging-next).
> 
> Short question, without commenting on brcm80211 code yet:
> 
> Why should we want 2 mainline drivers for the same hardware?

Rafał,

The brcm80211 tree provides two device drivers:

The brcmsmac driver supports the BCM4313, BCM43224, and BCM43225 chipsets with
full performance (e.g. rate/range comparable to Windows drivers), does not have
any known system stability issues, is fully supported by Broadcom, and provides
an API for addition of newer chipsets that will help speed up the process of
getting support for those chipsets into the kernel.

The brcmfmac driver supports the BCM4329 chipset with full performance, does
not have any known system stability issues, is fully supported by Broadcom, and
provides the framework for the addition of other Broadcom embedded WLAN
chipsets.

There currently isn't any driver in mainline that provides all this, so I'm
proposing that we use the brcm80211 tree to get all this functionality.

- Henry



  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-07-07 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-07-07  0:20 [RFC] Move brcm80211 to mainline Henry Ptasinski
2011-07-07  0:40 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-07-07  0:58   ` Pavel Roskin
2011-07-07  1:45     ` Greg KH
2011-07-07 14:46       ` Henry Ptasinski
2011-07-07 14:58         ` Greg KH
2011-07-07 21:55           ` Henry Ptasinski
2011-07-07 22:04             ` Greg KH
2011-07-07 22:25             ` Pavel Roskin
2011-07-07 15:17         ` Jonas Gorski
2011-07-07 21:21   ` Henry Ptasinski [this message]
2011-07-07  0:45 ` Pavel Roskin
2011-07-07 15:01   ` Henry Ptasinski
2011-08-24 22:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Henry Ptasinski
2011-08-24 22:53   ` Greg KH
2011-08-24 23:17     ` Henry Ptasinski
2011-08-24 23:47       ` Greg KH
2011-08-24 23:54       ` Joe Perches
2011-08-25  0:42         ` Henry Ptasinski
2011-08-25  0:52           ` Joe Perches
2011-08-25  1:11             ` Henry Ptasinski
2011-08-25  2:23           ` Greg KH
2011-08-25  2:45             ` Joe Perches
2011-08-25  5:02       ` Johannes Berg
2011-09-30 21:54         ` Arend Van Spriel
2011-09-30 22:11           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-08-24 23:05   ` Dan Carpenter
2011-08-25  0:49     ` Henry Ptasinski
2011-08-24 23:10   ` Aaro Koskinen
2011-08-24 23:18     ` Henry Ptasinski
2011-08-24 23:54       ` Aaro Koskinen
2011-08-24 23:41   ` Jonas Gorski
2011-08-25  0:20     ` Henry Ptasinski
2011-08-25  8:53       ` Michael Büsch
2011-08-25 10:34       ` Jonas Gorski
2011-08-25 17:59         ` Henry Ptasinski
2011-08-25 21:07         ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-25 21:09           ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-26 17:58             ` Henry Ptasinski
2011-08-25 20:55   ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-25 21:11     ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-25 21:23     ` Larry Finger
2011-08-26 17:55     ` Henry Ptasinski
2011-08-26 19:37       ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-26 19:45       ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-27 12:05       ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-27 13:18         ` Michael Büsch
2011-08-27 13:58           ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-30 13:02           ` David Woodhouse
2011-08-27 14:35     ` Dan Carpenter
2011-08-27 14:50       ` Greg KH
2011-08-27 15:08         ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-27 15:12           ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-27 16:45             ` Hauke Mehrtens
2011-08-27 15:21           ` Greg KH
2011-08-27 15:27             ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-30  1:42             ` Henry Ptasinski
2011-08-30  4:28               ` Greg KH
2011-08-30  6:22                 ` Johannes Berg
2011-08-30  8:31                   ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-30  9:28                     ` Michael Büsch
2011-08-31 12:31                       ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-30  6:17               ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-10 16:48                 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-08-30 18:14               ` Greg KH
2011-08-31 17:55                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-08-31 18:33                   ` Greg KH
2011-08-31 18:58                     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-08-31 11:55               ` Hauke Mehrtens
2011-08-31 14:18                 ` John W. Linville
2011-08-31 17:46                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-08-31 17:47                     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-08-27 14:59       ` Rafał Miłecki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110707212149.GR23944@broadcom.com \
    --to=henryp@broadcom.com \
    --cc=arend@broadcom.com \
    --cc=brudley@broadcom.com \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=frankyl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=rvossen@broadcom.com \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).