From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-path: <linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:39219 "EHLO
	smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753115Ab1HANr1 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:47:27 -0400
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 09:30:45 -0400
From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bloat] bufferbloat bug 216 could use some eyeballs badly
Message-ID: <20110801133044.GA28112@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20110801_154730_963381_D4FDF7CB)
References: <CAA93jw5jPe__jjxo5PMUm5S6ffcyapmqzXgXqtNX4Cd0ToE7vA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5jPe__jjxo5PMUm5S6ffcyapmqzXgXqtNX4Cd0ToE7vA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org>

On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 06:06:43AM -0600, Dave Taht wrote:
> If anyone can spare some eyeballs for the discussion of wireless-n AMPDUs
> and their interaction with bufferbloat, and groks TCP's behavior and/or
> wireless's behavior, I'd appreciate some comment on:
> 
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/216
> 
> Losing SOME appropriate packets, somewhere in the wireless stack, is
> necessary.

It seems appropriate to Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org for this...

-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.