* Re: [Bloat] bufferbloat bug 216 could use some eyeballs badly
[not found] <CAA93jw5jPe__jjxo5PMUm5S6ffcyapmqzXgXqtNX4Cd0ToE7vA@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2011-08-01 13:30 ` John W. Linville
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: John W. Linville @ 2011-08-01 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Taht; +Cc: bloat, linux-wireless
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 06:06:43AM -0600, Dave Taht wrote:
> If anyone can spare some eyeballs for the discussion of wireless-n AMPDUs
> and their interaction with bufferbloat, and groks TCP's behavior and/or
> wireless's behavior, I'd appreciate some comment on:
>
> http://www.bufferbloat.net/issues/216
>
> Losing SOME appropriate packets, somewhere in the wireless stack, is
> necessary.
It seems appropriate to Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org for this...
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread