Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>,
	Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM List <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: 3.1-rc1-git9: Reported regressions 2.6.39 -> 3.0
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 08:37:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110815153759.GF2389@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xuTC4jRtHbB.A.l4H.gMCSOB@chimera>

On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:02:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [NOTE:
>  We already have a bug entry for tracking regressions from 3.0:
> 
>  http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40982
> 
>  but there are no reports linked to it, mostly because Maciej is on vacation,
>  but also because the frequency of reporting regressions has been low
>  recently.  So, if you're seeing a regression from 3.0, please let us know.]
> 
> This message contains a list of some post-2.6.39 regressions introduced before
> 3.0, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
> 
> If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.39 regressions, please let us know
> either and we'll add them to the list.  Also, please let us know if any
> of the entries below are invalid.
> 
> Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
> this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
> issue.
> 
> 
> Listed regressions statistics:
> 
>   Date          Total  Pending  Unresolved
>   ----------------------------------------
>   2011-08-14       63       22          19
> 
> 
> Unresolved regressions
> ----------------------
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40282
> Subject		: IP forwarding regression since 3.0-rc6
> Submitter	: Stephan Seitz <stse+lkml@fsing.rootsland.net>
> Date		: 2011-07-25 12:51 (21 days old)
> Message-ID	: <20110725T141145.GA.2ae38.stse@fsing.rootsland.net>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131159880004908&w=2
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40172
> Subject		: lockdep trace from post 3.0.
> Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> Date		: 2011-07-24 1:32 (22 days old)
> Message-ID	: <20110724013257.GA6777@redhat.com>
> References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131147120206819&w=2
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
> Subject		: RCU stall in linux-3.0.0
> Submitter	: Philip Armstrong <phil@kantaka.co.uk>
> Date		: 2011-07-25 21:44 (21 days old)

This one was due the the CPU's idea of the current time getting way
out of sync (as in more than a minute's worth of disagreement, which is
pretty impressive when you think about it).  So what happened is that
one CPU decided that the current grace period was a full minute old
immediately, and thus started screaming piteously.  John Stultz provided
a configuration workaround, and he and Thomas Gleixner would be working
out the long-term fix.

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-15 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-14 19:02 3.1-rc1-git9: Reported regressions 2.6.39 -> 3.0 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-15 15:37 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2011-08-15 17:43   ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110815153759.GF2389@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=florian@mickler.org \
    --cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox