linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael Büsch" <m@bues.ch>
To: "Brett Rudley" <brudley@broadcom.com>
Cc: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>, "Greg KH" <greg@kroah.com>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@broadcom.com>,
	"gregkh@suse.de" <gregkh@suse.de>,
	"devel@linuxdriverproject.org" <devel@linuxdriverproject.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] staging: brcm80211: 7th reaction for mainline patch #2
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 01:28:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110922012851.2f3b7801@milhouse> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7A94256FD72B884D9E7C55586C3CBCEE195814DE92@SJEXCHCCR01.corp.ad.broadcom.com>

On Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:15:10 -0700
"Brett Rudley" <brudley@broadcom.com> wrote:

> We did however initially propose (and implement) a dividing line of ssb chips for b43 and AXI based chips for brcmsmac but b43 team chose to ignore/reject that. 

Well, what about embedded, for instance?

> I'm not totally opposed to that idea but it does not solve the primary issue of conflicting b43 and brcmsmac modules.

I'm not convinced that this is an issue at all and I'm not convinced that it has to be resolved.
At least not now.

-- 
Greetings, Michael.

  reply	other threads:[~2011-09-21 23:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-09-19 21:25 [PATCH 00/20] staging: brcm80211: 7th reaction for mainline patch #2 Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:25 ` [PATCH 01/20] staging: brcm80211: sparse endianness warnings on dongle events Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:25 ` [PATCH 02/20] staging: brcm80211: various fulmac sparse endianness fixes Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:25 ` [PATCH 03/20] staging: brcm80211: sparse endianness warnings for struct brcmf_proto_cdc_ioctl Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:25 ` [PATCH 04/20] staging: brcm80211: sparse endianness warnings for struct sdpcm_shared Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:25 ` [PATCH 05/20] staging: brcm80211: more fullmac sparse endianness scan related changes Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:25 ` [PATCH 06/20] staging: brcm80211: remove unconditional code blocks from brcmfmac Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:25 ` [PATCH 07/20] staging: brcm80211: remove event handler thread from fullmac Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:25 ` [PATCH 08/20] staging: brcm80211: remove fullmac module_param brcmf_dongle_memsize Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:25 ` [PATCH 09/20] staging: brcm80211: remove fullmac module_param brcmf_sdiod_drive_strength Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:25 ` [PATCH 10/20] staging: brcm80211: remove fullmac module_param for watchdog Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:25 ` [PATCH 11/20] staging: brcm80211: remove fullmac module_param brcmf_idletime Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 12/20] staging: brcm80211: remove global variables for data frame boundary Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 13/20] staging: brcm80211: removed two fullmac sparse spinlock warnings Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 14/20] staging: brcm80211: added endianness check flag to fullmac Makefile Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 15/20] staging: brcm80211: removed likely/unlikely calls Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 16/20] staging: brcm80211: removed log after kzalloc()/kmalloc() failure Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 17/20] staging: brcm80211: clarified fullmac io and event codes Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 18/20] staging: brcm80211: consistent naming of struct net_device *ndev Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 19/20] staging: brcm80211: simplified internal ioctl function once more Franky Lin
2011-09-19 21:26 ` [PATCH 20/20] staging: brcm80211: reduced checkpatch warnings to zero Franky Lin
2011-09-20  0:04   ` Joe Perches
2011-09-20  0:59     ` Joe Perches
2011-09-20  1:12       ` Franky Lin
2011-09-20  1:04     ` Franky Lin
2011-09-20 13:03 ` [PATCH 00/20] staging: brcm80211: 7th reaction for mainline patch #2 Greg KH
2011-09-20 13:21   ` Johannes Berg
2011-09-20 13:36     ` John W. Linville
2011-09-20 13:45       ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-20 13:40     ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-20 13:50     ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-20 20:56     ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-20 21:12       ` Alex Deucher
2011-09-20 21:23         ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-21 23:26         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2011-09-21 13:40       ` John W. Linville
2011-09-21 13:52         ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-21 13:55           ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-21 14:39             ` Larry Finger
2011-09-20 13:22   ` John W. Linville
2011-09-20 14:00     ` Greg KH
2011-09-21 18:33       ` Brett Rudley
2011-09-21 20:01         ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-21 22:12           ` Brett Rudley
2011-09-21 22:35             ` Michael Büsch
2011-09-21 23:15               ` Brett Rudley
2011-09-21 23:28                 ` Michael Büsch [this message]
2011-09-22  2:07                   ` Brett Rudley
2011-09-22  6:36                     ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-22  8:53                   ` Arend Van Spriel
2011-09-22  8:57                     ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-22  9:10                       ` Arend Van Spriel
2011-09-22  9:12                         ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-22 10:07                     ` Jonas Gorski
2011-09-22 13:39                       ` Arend Van Spriel
2011-09-22  9:44               ` Johannes Berg
2011-09-22 10:29                 ` Michael Büsch
2011-09-22  6:47             ` Hauke Mehrtens
2011-09-22  9:04               ` Arend Van Spriel
2011-09-22  9:08                 ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-22 10:38                   ` Michael Büsch
2011-09-22  6:54             ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-22  7:24               ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-22  7:28             ` Rafał Miłecki
2011-09-22 14:31             ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-22 18:37               ` Arend Van Spriel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110922012851.2f3b7801@milhouse \
    --to=m@bues.ch \
    --cc=brudley@broadcom.com \
    --cc=devel@linuxdriverproject.org \
    --cc=frankyl@broadcom.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=gregkh@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).