From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:51894 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754314Ab1I3Spk (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:45:40 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:43:11 -0400 From: "John W. Linville" To: Johannes Berg Cc: Eliad Peller , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mac80211: pass vif param to conf_tx() callback Message-ID: <20110930184310.GB2526@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20110930_204544_106277_0443F498) References: <1316970415-23239-1-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> <1316970415-23239-3-git-send-email-eliad@wizery.com> <1317217708.3986.17.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1317217708.3986.17.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 03:48:28PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 20:06 +0300, Eliad Peller wrote: > > tx params should be configured per interface. > > Add ieee80211_vif param to the conf_tx callback, > > and update all the drivers that use this callback. > > I see patches 1 and 2 in the tree, but not this. I suspect the reason is > that it was actually incomplete, not updating for example iwlwifi > because there the function is defined in another file and the spatch > failed? It didn't apply. I thought I might try again now that I pulled wireless into wireless-next... John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.