From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from charlotte.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.58]:40497 "EHLO smtp.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752118Ab1KQTam (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:30:42 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:03:08 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" To: Kalle Valo Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka , Greg Dietsche , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: pull request: iwlegacy 2011-11-16 Message-ID: <20111117190307.GE32622@tuxdriver.com> (sfid-20111117_203045_703607_6644D70B) References: <20111116122205.GA4409@redhat.com> <87y5vf8ak3.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <87y5vf8ak3.fsf@purkki.adurom.net> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 09:36:44AM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > Hi Stanislaw, > > Stanislaw Gruszka writes: > > > Please pull iwlegacy cleanup changes done by Greg and me, intended > > for 3.3. These request include huge patches with file renaming and > > automatic code processing done by sed and indent. Driver is still > > quite messy and need more cleanup, but these massive changes bring > > driver close to the state that we could name it maintainable. > > > > Hopefully with having clean, maintainable code I will be able to fix > > some nasty not easy reproducible bugs, we still have in the iwlegacy > > driver. > > I haven't seen these patches on linux-wireless mailing list at all. > Isn't it recommended that all wireless patches are sent to > linux-wireless for public review? Yes, it is. Please make sure to send these patches to the list for review by the group. Thanks, John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.