From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from csmtp1.one.com ([195.47.247.21]:30246 "EHLO csmtp1.one.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751345Ab1KQU44 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:56:56 -0500 Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 21:56:31 +0100 From: Daniel Kuehn To: Gabor Juhos Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Seeing as alot of ath9k devices is PCI/PCIe or their mini equivalent it makes sense to set ATH9K_PCI to y by default Message-ID: <20111117215631.2c2064b1@Artemis> (sfid-20111117_215700_771105_CB2DBA51) In-Reply-To: <4EC5562B.4050001@openwrt.org> References: <20111109235757.79821a20@Artemis> <4EC524B1.2070200@openwrt.org> <20111117163947.1749dfb1@Artemis> <4EC5562B.4050001@openwrt.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/s/GGj0CndH6K/peJa.hVR5L"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --Sig_/s/GGj0CndH6K/peJa.hVR5L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:44:59 +0100 Gabor Juhos wrote: > 2011.11.17. 16:39 keltez=C3=A9ssel, Daniel Kuehn =C3=ADrta: >=20 > > I agree with you there if it was removed before, maybe then only the he= lp=20 > > section of ath9k should be changed to say that you have to enable eithe= r=20 > > PCI/PCIe or AHB support for it to work? >=20 > Yes, adding a comment there would make sense, although that does not prev= ent > to build ath9k without bus support. Yeah, that is the initial problem I found that I wanted to try and patch, b= ut seeing as it only stands between either always enabling it, or forcing one = or the other bus always on if you choose ath9k I don't know what else could be done except note in the help that you also need to enable bus support. I haven't poked around that much with Kconfig but it clearly seems like the= re isn't a way to default select y but make it possible to disable it... So there doesn't seem to be a clear way to automagically include the most common bus support for ath9k. >=20 > -Gabor Kind regards, Daniel Kuehn --Sig_/s/GGj0CndH6K/peJa.hVR5L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOxXUWAAoJEOYWIJmjnr1S0YEP/RJrcb1S+hGJOtsibrbV5W1X fZiPlROWVIJ/ytXfhtansSNFvBxycVgCLlqSXiorsJ43l0ebHQlK/vAJSw6ta7Qs 31WSnI5oVFTmkv6/v7oVKdWaOIKm0hXzCpbzJPIgLjQbH5Iumi7PY63cfVEIqTJT X1jOt+PiGCFPvjru3US9bveLC/7A0lNsvozKsiMPbYFnVMCjZFLh8jejcuR1wDVu 17sfjVCyT0mJYoe4WtmpcAOKSLp/V86awKHMhlSJErIbIGSl+XqOFCx9CChrM1WY bBv01uhw9fBne/MMbdYJof9/ifDcxQB+FnV/4rbaYyWOjyUutYtQ6tscb708C2C5 LqyRxUn4x1gftLGUIU8oiq5LM44fMjzwejGtKDR8KUzOFniXqj+hkfSAmM6fvkoE KPjkYGEjfZMQhlM8eKpXiqjcHZY8A0OTiV1HSA65ZhWGSFwdjt/K1pMqcshN7vSL qbE7gddvfniMkl5fEi9g583b9idr31i/rwA57dsFGe1pDx1ceWQavnqZFxAU21YF wsyVHv+z/8kE1PGUFUl8HrhflKhu0ftg/Gjb9YPH4osGiPXYzxPFh3a30liLlN9s cOnrKmcFa6i5pNB5yvtlF+KVwAKQh8hXxQ/SGLrU6J0KNmFrmHcfJzjSKt3V0+A1 NBfrEyNl81nafV2wDDcu =e5cL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/s/GGj0CndH6K/peJa.hVR5L--