From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Francisco <pedrogfrancisco@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iwl3945 firmware errors: tentative debugging
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 13:54:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111124125414.GA8077@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZjf_yEBb3BEf+-Fei78xBmJT1Y_Jr5fPUJNKwi6kvuVg24KA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Pedro
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:49:30AM +0000, Pedro Francisco wrote:
> iwl3945 has had firmware errors triggered 'by' NM after started using
> nl80211 instead of wext. Since Intel has stopped supporting iwl3945,
> no firmware fix has been possible. It has been workarounded by
> disable_hw_scan=1 as default, with the penalty of network performance
> being lower and frequent 'hangs' on the connection.
Eh, we changed to software scan by default for workaround various
problems. Unfortunately that is causing other problems for other
users. For now, do not exist best default disable_hw_scan= value, that
would pleased everyone :-(
> I was able to trigger the firmware error by doing "iw dev wlan0 scan
> passive". By comparison, "iw dev wlan0 scan" does NOT trigger the
> firmware error.
> Having activated firmware debugging, it would seem a firmware error
> occurs when a full passive scan is done. If all channels 1-140 are
> scanned passively, a firmware error occurs. If at least one of those
> channels is actively scanned, no error occurs.
>
> Where should I look next?
Good finding, I'm able to reproduce that firmware error too. Perhaps
you could install older kernel ie. 2.6.32 or even 2.6.24 and see if you
can recreate problem there (but I'm not sure if on older kernel
"iw dev wlan0 scan passive" command will work). If you will find kernel
version, where issue is not present, you might figure out what is
different regarding setting up SCAN command, or let me know so I
will look at that :-) If that is broken also on old kernels, we
perhaps could modify code that will disallow to do all passive
channels scan.
Thanks
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-24 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAJZjf_xDm_RaFqxF-r+MAPyh_HcCb+yV4dNrfhr+LH0-z2zk8g@mail.gmail.com>
2011-11-24 11:49 ` iwl3945 firmware errors: tentative debugging Pedro Francisco
2011-11-24 12:54 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2011-11-29 15:43 ` Pedro Francisco
2011-11-29 17:07 ` Pedro Francisco
2011-12-21 11:33 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-01-17 16:07 ` Pedro Francisco
2011-11-25 7:00 ` Kalle Valo
2011-11-25 16:18 ` Pedro Francisco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111124125414.GA8077@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pedrogfrancisco@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).