* [PATCH V2 1/2] cfg80211: Define a wrapper function for reporting roaming
@ 2011-12-07 13:42 Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2011-12-07 13:46 ` Johannes Berg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan @ 2011-12-07 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linville; +Cc: johannes, linux-wireless
It is quite possible to run into a race in bss timeout where
the drivers see the bss entry just before notifying cfg80211
of a roaming event but it got timed out by the time rdev->event_work
got scehduled from cfg80211_wq. This would result in the following
WARN-ON() along with the failure to notify the user space of
the roaming. The other situation which is happening with ath6kl
that runs into issue is when the driver reports roam to same AP
event where the AP bss entry already got expired.
[158645.538384] WARNING: at net/wireless/sme.c:586
__cfg80211_roamed+0xc2/0x1b1()
[158645.538810] Call Trace:
[158645.538838] [<c1033527>] warn_slowpath_common+0x65/0x7a
[158645.538917] [<c14cfacf>] ? __cfg80211_roamed+0xc2/0x1b1
[158645.538946] [<c103354b>] warn_slowpath_null+0xf/0x13
[158645.539055] [<c14cfacf>] __cfg80211_roamed+0xc2/0x1b1
[158645.539086] [<c14beb5b>] cfg80211_process_rdev_events+0x153/0x1cc
[158645.539166] [<c14bd57b>] cfg80211_event_work+0x26/0x36
[158645.539195] [<c10482ae>] process_one_work+0x219/0x38b
[158645.539273] [<c14bd555>] ? wiphy_new+0x419/0x419
[158645.539301] [<c10486cb>] worker_thread+0xf6/0x1bf
[158645.539379] [<c10485d5>] ? rescuer_thread+0x1b5/0x1b5
[158645.539407] [<c104b3e2>] kthread+0x62/0x67
[158645.539484] [<c104b380>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x42/0x42
[158645.539514] [<c151309a>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0xd
To fix this, define a wrapper function that driver can use to report
roaming with the bss entry to which it got roamed.
Reported-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qca.qualcomm.com>
---
V2 -- Make cfg80211_roamed_bss() responsible to release
the bss reference in case of any failures.
include/net/cfg80211.h | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
net/wireless/core.h | 2 ++
net/wireless/sme.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
net/wireless/util.c | 7 ++++---
4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/net/cfg80211.h b/include/net/cfg80211.h
index 8d7ba09..6ee7522 100644
--- a/include/net/cfg80211.h
+++ b/include/net/cfg80211.h
@@ -3085,6 +3085,33 @@ void cfg80211_roamed(struct net_device *dev,
const u8 *resp_ie, size_t resp_ie_len, gfp_t gfp);
/**
+ * cfg80211_roamed_bss - notify cfg80211 of roaming
+ *
+ * @dev: network device
+ * @bss: entry of bss to which STA got roamed (may be %NULL)
+ * @channel: the channel of the new AP
+ * @bssid: the BSSID of the new AP
+ * @req_ie: association request IEs (maybe be %NULL)
+ * @req_ie_len: association request IEs length
+ * @resp_ie: association response IEs (may be %NULL)
+ * @resp_ie_len: assoc response IEs length
+ * @gfp: allocation flags
+ *
+ * This is just a wrapper to notify cfg80211 of roaming event with driver
+ * passing bss to avoid a race in timeout of the bss entry. It should be
+ * called by the underlying driver whenever it roamed from one AP to another
+ * while connected. Drivers which have roaming implemented in firmware
+ * may use this function to avoid a race in bss entry timeout where the bss
+ * entry of the new AP is seen in the driver, but gets timed out by the time
+ * it is accessed in __cfg80211_roamed() due to delay in scheduling
+ * rdev->event_work.
+ */
+void cfg80211_roamed_bss(struct net_device *dev, struct cfg80211_bss *bss,
+ struct ieee80211_channel *channel,
+ const u8 *bssid,
+ const u8 *req_ie, size_t req_ie_len,
+ const u8 *resp_ie, size_t resp_ie_len, gfp_t gfp);
+/**
* cfg80211_disconnected - notify cfg80211 that connection was dropped
*
* @dev: network device
diff --git a/net/wireless/core.h b/net/wireless/core.h
index 1c7d4df..c4c3c1d 100644
--- a/net/wireless/core.h
+++ b/net/wireless/core.h
@@ -255,6 +255,7 @@ struct cfg80211_event {
const u8 *resp_ie;
size_t req_ie_len;
size_t resp_ie_len;
+ struct cfg80211_bss *bss;
} rm;
struct {
const u8 *ie;
@@ -397,6 +398,7 @@ int cfg80211_disconnect(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev,
struct net_device *dev, u16 reason,
bool wextev);
void __cfg80211_roamed(struct wireless_dev *wdev,
+ struct cfg80211_bss *bss,
struct ieee80211_channel *channel,
const u8 *bssid,
const u8 *req_ie, size_t req_ie_len,
diff --git a/net/wireless/sme.c b/net/wireless/sme.c
index 0acfdc9..54d20ff 100644
--- a/net/wireless/sme.c
+++ b/net/wireless/sme.c
@@ -551,12 +551,12 @@ void cfg80211_connect_result(struct net_device *dev, const u8 *bssid,
EXPORT_SYMBOL(cfg80211_connect_result);
void __cfg80211_roamed(struct wireless_dev *wdev,
+ struct cfg80211_bss *bss,
struct ieee80211_channel *channel,
const u8 *bssid,
const u8 *req_ie, size_t req_ie_len,
const u8 *resp_ie, size_t resp_ie_len)
{
- struct cfg80211_bss *bss;
#ifdef CONFIG_CFG80211_WEXT
union iwreq_data wrqu;
#endif
@@ -565,23 +565,25 @@ void __cfg80211_roamed(struct wireless_dev *wdev,
if (WARN_ON(wdev->iftype != NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION &&
wdev->iftype != NL80211_IFTYPE_P2P_CLIENT))
- return;
+ goto out;
if (wdev->sme_state != CFG80211_SME_CONNECTED)
- return;
+ goto out;
/* internal error -- how did we get to CONNECTED w/o BSS? */
if (WARN_ON(!wdev->current_bss)) {
- return;
+ goto out;
}
cfg80211_unhold_bss(wdev->current_bss);
cfg80211_put_bss(&wdev->current_bss->pub);
wdev->current_bss = NULL;
- bss = cfg80211_get_bss(wdev->wiphy, channel, bssid,
- wdev->ssid, wdev->ssid_len,
- WLAN_CAPABILITY_ESS, WLAN_CAPABILITY_ESS);
+ if (!bss)
+ bss = cfg80211_get_bss(wdev->wiphy, channel, bssid,
+ wdev->ssid, wdev->ssid_len,
+ WLAN_CAPABILITY_ESS,
+ WLAN_CAPABILITY_ESS);
if (WARN_ON(!bss))
return;
@@ -615,6 +617,11 @@ void __cfg80211_roamed(struct wireless_dev *wdev,
wdev->wext.prev_bssid_valid = true;
wireless_send_event(wdev->netdev, SIOCGIWAP, &wrqu, NULL);
#endif
+
+ return;
+out:
+ if (bss)
+ cfg80211_put_bss(bss);
}
void cfg80211_roamed(struct net_device *dev,
@@ -623,6 +630,16 @@ void cfg80211_roamed(struct net_device *dev,
const u8 *req_ie, size_t req_ie_len,
const u8 *resp_ie, size_t resp_ie_len, gfp_t gfp)
{
+ cfg80211_roamed_bss(dev, NULL, channel, bssid, req_ie, req_ie_len,
+ resp_ie, resp_ie_len, gfp);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(cfg80211_roamed);
+
+void cfg80211_roamed_bss(struct net_device *dev, struct cfg80211_bss *bss,
+ struct ieee80211_channel *channel,
+ const u8 *bssid, const u8 *req_ie, size_t req_ie_len,
+ const u8 *resp_ie, size_t resp_ie_len, gfp_t gfp)
+{
struct wireless_dev *wdev = dev->ieee80211_ptr;
struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev = wiphy_to_dev(wdev->wiphy);
struct cfg80211_event *ev;
@@ -631,8 +648,10 @@ void cfg80211_roamed(struct net_device *dev,
CFG80211_DEV_WARN_ON(wdev->sme_state != CFG80211_SME_CONNECTED);
ev = kzalloc(sizeof(*ev) + req_ie_len + resp_ie_len, gfp);
- if (!ev)
+ if (!ev) {
+ cfg80211_put_bss(bss);
return;
+ }
ev->type = EVENT_ROAMED;
ev->rm.channel = channel;
@@ -643,13 +662,15 @@ void cfg80211_roamed(struct net_device *dev,
ev->rm.resp_ie = ((u8 *)ev) + sizeof(*ev) + req_ie_len;
ev->rm.resp_ie_len = resp_ie_len;
memcpy((void *)ev->rm.resp_ie, resp_ie, resp_ie_len);
+ ev->rm.bss = bss;
spin_lock_irqsave(&wdev->event_lock, flags);
list_add_tail(&ev->list, &wdev->event_list);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wdev->event_lock, flags);
queue_work(cfg80211_wq, &rdev->event_work);
+
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(cfg80211_roamed);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(cfg80211_roamed_bss);
void __cfg80211_disconnected(struct net_device *dev, const u8 *ie,
size_t ie_len, u16 reason, bool from_ap)
diff --git a/net/wireless/util.c b/net/wireless/util.c
index 4dde429..bffabf5 100644
--- a/net/wireless/util.c
+++ b/net/wireless/util.c
@@ -752,9 +752,10 @@ static void cfg80211_process_wdev_events(struct wireless_dev *wdev)
NULL);
break;
case EVENT_ROAMED:
- __cfg80211_roamed(wdev, ev->rm.channel, ev->rm.bssid,
- ev->rm.req_ie, ev->rm.req_ie_len,
- ev->rm.resp_ie, ev->rm.resp_ie_len);
+ __cfg80211_roamed(wdev, ev->rm.bss, ev->rm.channel,
+ ev->rm.bssid, ev->rm.req_ie,
+ ev->rm.req_ie_len, ev->rm.resp_ie,
+ ev->rm.resp_ie_len);
break;
case EVENT_DISCONNECTED:
__cfg80211_disconnected(wdev->netdev,
--
1.7.0.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] cfg80211: Define a wrapper function for reporting roaming
2011-12-07 13:42 [PATCH V2 1/2] cfg80211: Define a wrapper function for reporting roaming Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
@ 2011-12-07 13:46 ` Johannes Berg
2011-12-07 13:58 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2011-12-07 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan; +Cc: linville, linux-wireless
On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 19:12 +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> /**
> + * cfg80211_roamed_bss - notify cfg80211 of roaming
> + *
> + * @dev: network device
> + * @bss: entry of bss to which STA got roamed (may be %NULL)
I think you should check that it isn't, that's an implementation thing
of __cfg80211_roamed() I think? Semantically, I don't think this should
happen here?
It would also be good to note that the reference to the bss is given to
the function and it will be released by it.
> +void cfg80211_roamed_bss(struct net_device *dev, struct cfg80211_bss *bss,
> + struct ieee80211_channel *channel,
> + const u8 *bssid, const u8 *req_ie, size_t req_ie_len,
> + const u8 *resp_ie, size_t resp_ie_len, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> struct wireless_dev *wdev = dev->ieee80211_ptr;
> struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev = wiphy_to_dev(wdev->wiphy);
> struct cfg80211_event *ev;
Hmm, now that I think about it more, I think the calling convention is
really strange. Why pass the channel and bssid when the BSS struct is
already known?
Why not make cfg80211_roamed() do the BSS lookup (which would also
reduce the race for drivers that don't use _bss()) based on the info,
and then call a cfg80211_roamed_bss() that doesn't get channel/bssid.
johannes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] cfg80211: Define a wrapper function for reporting roaming
2011-12-07 13:46 ` Johannes Berg
@ 2011-12-07 13:58 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2011-12-07 15:05 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan @ 2011-12-07 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Berg; +Cc: linville, linux-wireless
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 02:46:44PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 19:12 +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
>
> > /**
> > + * cfg80211_roamed_bss - notify cfg80211 of roaming
> > + *
> > + * @dev: network device
> > + * @bss: entry of bss to which STA got roamed (may be %NULL)
>
> I think you should check that it isn't, that's an implementation thing
> of __cfg80211_roamed() I think? Semantically, I don't think this should
> happen here?
This is because cfg80211_roamed() can call it with NULL as bss,
but I agree this should have been stated.
>
> It would also be good to note that the reference to the bss is given to
> the function and it will be released by it.
Ok.
>
> > +void cfg80211_roamed_bss(struct net_device *dev, struct cfg80211_bss *bss,
> > + struct ieee80211_channel *channel,
> > + const u8 *bssid, const u8 *req_ie, size_t req_ie_len,
> > + const u8 *resp_ie, size_t resp_ie_len, gfp_t gfp)
> > +{
> > struct wireless_dev *wdev = dev->ieee80211_ptr;
> > struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev = wiphy_to_dev(wdev->wiphy);
> > struct cfg80211_event *ev;
>
>
> Hmm, now that I think about it more, I think the calling convention is
> really strange. Why pass the channel and bssid when the BSS struct is
> already known?
>
> Why not make cfg80211_roamed() do the BSS lookup (which would also
> reduce the race for drivers that don't use _bss()) based on the info,
> and then call a cfg80211_roamed_bss() that doesn't get channel/bssid.
Sure, i'll change it. This looks better.
Thanks!
Vasanth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] cfg80211: Define a wrapper function for reporting roaming
2011-12-07 13:58 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
@ 2011-12-07 15:05 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2011-12-14 18:54 ` John W. Linville
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan @ 2011-12-07 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Johannes Berg; +Cc: linville, linux-wireless
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 07:28:24PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, now that I think about it more, I think the calling convention is
> > really strange. Why pass the channel and bssid when the BSS struct is
> > already known?
> >
> > Why not make cfg80211_roamed() do the BSS lookup (which would also
> > reduce the race for drivers that don't use _bss()) based on the info,
> > and then call a cfg80211_roamed_bss() that doesn't get channel/bssid.
>
> Sure, i'll change it. This looks better.
Also, i'll create a new patch instead of the next version.
Vasanth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] cfg80211: Define a wrapper function for reporting roaming
2011-12-07 15:05 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
@ 2011-12-14 18:54 ` John W. Linville
2011-12-15 4:39 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: John W. Linville @ 2011-12-14 18:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan; +Cc: Johannes Berg, linux-wireless
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 08:35:45PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 07:28:24PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> > >
> > > Hmm, now that I think about it more, I think the calling convention is
> > > really strange. Why pass the channel and bssid when the BSS struct is
> > > already known?
> > >
> > > Why not make cfg80211_roamed() do the BSS lookup (which would also
> > > reduce the race for drivers that don't use _bss()) based on the info,
> > > and then call a cfg80211_roamed_bss() that doesn't get channel/bssid.
> >
> > Sure, i'll change it. This looks better.
>
> Also, i'll create a new patch instead of the next version.
Is that patch still coming?
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH V2 1/2] cfg80211: Define a wrapper function for reporting roaming
2011-12-14 18:54 ` John W. Linville
@ 2011-12-15 4:39 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan @ 2011-12-15 4:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John W. Linville; +Cc: Johannes Berg, linux-wireless
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 01:54:49PM -0500, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 08:35:45PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 07:28:24PM +0530, Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, now that I think about it more, I think the calling convention is
> > > > really strange. Why pass the channel and bssid when the BSS struct is
> > > > already known?
> > > >
> > > > Why not make cfg80211_roamed() do the BSS lookup (which would also
> > > > reduce the race for drivers that don't use _bss()) based on the info,
> > > > and then call a cfg80211_roamed_bss() that doesn't get channel/bssid.
> > >
> > > Sure, i'll change it. This looks better.
> >
> > Also, i'll create a new patch instead of the next version.
>
> Is that patch still coming?
Please drop this, a different patch (cfg80211: Fix race in bss
timeout) which fixes the same issue has been sent.
Vasanth
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-12-15 4:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-07 13:42 [PATCH V2 1/2] cfg80211: Define a wrapper function for reporting roaming Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2011-12-07 13:46 ` Johannes Berg
2011-12-07 13:58 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2011-12-07 15:05 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2011-12-14 18:54 ` John W. Linville
2011-12-15 4:39 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).