From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Francisco <pedrogfrancisco@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: iwl3945 firmware errors: tentative debugging
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:33:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111221113329.GA2235@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZjf_zM2zBsoh66KcRwgi-jS7DF-qH5-sKrUoCB=hFTPES7LA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 920 bytes --]
Hi Pedro,
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 05:07:55PM +0000, Pedro Francisco wrote:
> My country has the following regulatory.bin lines:
>
> country PT: (2402.000 - 2482.000 @ 40.000), (N/A, 20.00) (5170.000 -
> 5250.000 @ 40.000), (N/A, 20.00) (5250.000 - 5330.000 @ 40.000), (N/A,
> 20.00), DFS <------ removed whole line (5490.000 - 5710.000 @ 40.000),
> (N/A, 27.00), DFS <------ removed whole line
>
> If I remove the last two lines, everything works as expected, i.e., NO
> "Microsode SW error". If I include any of the last two, the Microcode
> will issue an error.
>
> I've tried every combination of those lines except just one of
> "(5250.000 - 5330.000 @ 40.000), (N/A, 20.00), DFS" OR "(5490.000 -
> 5710.000 @ 40.000), (N/A, 27.00), DFS".
Attached patch stop to trigger error on my setup with "iw dev wlan0 scan
passive". Can you check if it also fix problem on your normal wireless
workload?
Thanks
Stanislaw
[-- Attachment #2: iwlegacy-do-not-promote-to-active-scan-on-transmistion-detect.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 911 bytes --]
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlegacy/3945-mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlegacy/3945-mac.c
index daef6b5..b6df518 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlegacy/3945-mac.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlegacy/3945-mac.c
@@ -2624,12 +2624,12 @@ il3945_request_scan(struct il_priv *il, struct ieee80211_vif *vif)
}
/*
- * If active scaning is requested but a certain channel
- * is marked passive, we can do active scanning if we
- * detect transmissions.
+ * If active scaning is requested but a certain channel is marked
+ * passive, we can do active scanning if we detect transmissions. For
+ * passive only scanning disable switching to active on any channel.
*/
scan->good_CRC_th =
- is_active ? IL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DEFAULT : IL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DISABLED;
+ is_active ? IL_GOOD_CRC_TH_DEFAULT : IL_GOOD_CRC_TH_NEVER;
len =
il_fill_probe_req(il, (struct ieee80211_mgmt *)scan->data,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-21 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CAJZjf_xDm_RaFqxF-r+MAPyh_HcCb+yV4dNrfhr+LH0-z2zk8g@mail.gmail.com>
2011-11-24 11:49 ` iwl3945 firmware errors: tentative debugging Pedro Francisco
2011-11-24 12:54 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-29 15:43 ` Pedro Francisco
2011-11-29 17:07 ` Pedro Francisco
2011-12-21 11:33 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2012-01-17 16:07 ` Pedro Francisco
2011-11-25 7:00 ` Kalle Valo
2011-11-25 16:18 ` Pedro Francisco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111221113329.GA2235@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pedrogfrancisco@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).