From: Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
Cc: <ath6kl-devel@qualcomm.com>, <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ath6kl: add blocking debugfs file for retrieving firmware logs
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 15:29:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120207095933.GB5765@chvasanth-lnx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F30122E.3060004@qca.qualcomm.com>
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 07:47:26PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> > Are you not making sure that the
> > length of the data is not more than the requested one which is
> > passed to copy_to_user() so that read() is always called with
> > *ppos=0?. The following code seems to do that
>
> But the function is called multiple times with increasing values of
> *ppos as more data is returned to user space:
>
> [ 100.303747] ath6kl_fwlog_block_read(): *ppos 0
> [ 100.305252] ath6kl_fwlog_block_read(): *ppos 30116
> [ 101.768947] ath6kl_fwlog_block_read(): *ppos 31624
> [ 117.027469] ath6kl_fwlog_block_read(): *ppos 33124
> [ 117.090146] ath6kl_fwlog_block_read(): *ppos 34628
> [ 117.172338] ath6kl_fwlog_block_read(): *ppos 36128
>
> So I can't assume that *ppos = 0.
Right, unless we say we have no more data to pass
(when read() returns 0), *ppos would be keep on increasing
by the number of bytes copied to user space. Updating *ppos
just looks like a formality here though. But I'm also not
sure about doing it cleanly.
Vasanth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-07 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-06 6:23 [PATCH 1/2] ath6kl: store firmware logs in skbuffs Kalle Valo
2012-02-06 6:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] ath6kl: add blocking debugfs file for retrieving firmware logs Kalle Valo
2012-02-06 9:06 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2012-02-06 12:37 ` Kalle Valo
2012-02-06 15:05 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan
2012-02-06 17:47 ` Kalle Valo
2012-02-07 9:59 ` Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan [this message]
2012-02-08 9:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] ath6kl: store firmware logs in skbuffs Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120207095933.GB5765@chvasanth-lnx \
--to=vthiagar@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=ath6kl-devel@qualcomm.com \
--cc=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).