linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: "Tomáš Janoušek" <tomi@nomi.cz>
Cc: wwguy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	security@kernel.org
Subject: Re: iwlagn: memory corruption with WPA enterprise
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 15:57:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120305145700.GA17800@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120305140130.GA15186@nomi.cz>

On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 03:01:30PM +0100, Tomáš Janoušek wrote:
> > That make sense! Your "CPU instructions break things" theory sounds crazy,
> > but I think it's logical. WPA enterprise differ from WPA-PSA (pre shared
> > key) that the key changed periodically, SSL is used when keys are changed
> > (via wpa_supplicant). So looks like 32-bit openssl generate object code
> > that trigger bug on CPU, which crash other processes.
> 
> It seems that someone beat me to it. Since Linus fixed the FPU leaks in
> 3.3-rc4, I haven't experienced the problem. And I was this close! :-)

Yeh, that was really nasty bug. 

> Anyway, thanks for assistance and sorry for being so slow to respond.

No problem. Can you remind me, is this reproducible on 64-bit kernel
with 32-bit user space? I'm asking because I would like to know if we
need to  backport those fixes to our kernel. We do not enable
CONFIG_CRYPTO_AES_NI_INTEL on 32 bit kernel, only on 64 bit, but if this
problem happen with 32-bit user land with 64 bit kernel, we will need to
do backport.

Thanks
Stanislaw

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-05 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-29 17:15 iwlagn: memory corruption with WPA enterprise Tomáš Janoušek
2011-10-31 16:03 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-09 15:54   ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-09 15:59     ` wwguy
2011-11-09 16:51     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-10  9:18       ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-10 11:47         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-10 12:53           ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-10 16:07             ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-10 15:24               ` Guy, Wey-Yi
2011-11-10 16:42                 ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-10 17:02                   ` Larry Finger
2011-11-10 16:30               ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-11  5:47                 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-11 15:01                   ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-14 14:07                     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-19 18:11                       ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-20  2:13                         ` wwguy
2011-11-20  3:20                           ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-20  4:28                             ` wwguy
2011-11-20 20:40                               ` Tomáš Janoušek
2012-02-10 18:09                                 ` Tomáš Janoušek
2012-02-13  9:25                                   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-13 13:09                                     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-02-13 13:29                                       ` Tomáš Janoušek
2012-02-14  9:20                                   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-03-05 14:01                                     ` Tomáš Janoušek
2012-03-05 14:57                                       ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2012-03-05 15:00                                         ` Tomáš Janoušek
2012-03-05 15:11                                           ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-03-05 15:18                                             ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-21 13:05                         ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-21 13:09                           ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-21 13:40                             ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-21 14:32                               ` Tomáš Janoušek
2011-11-10 19:31         ` Adrian Chadd
2011-11-11  5:44           ` Stanislaw Gruszka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120305145700.GA17800@redhat.com \
    --to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=security@kernel.org \
    --cc=tomi@nomi.cz \
    --cc=wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).