From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: "Ted Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
preining@logic.at, egrumbach@gmail.com,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, ilw@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: 3.4-rc2, ilwagn still most of the time completely unusable
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 16:01:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120411200105.GA22002@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120411184047.GJ12044@thunk.org>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 02:40:47PM -0400, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> I'll note that I've been having troubles with my iwlagn driver losing
> the ability to connect to WPA2 authenticated AP's at work (Google
> Cambridge). This has been true for since sometime around 3.0; my
> excuse for why I haven't tried bisecting it is that it can take
> several hours for the bug to manifest itself, and when it does, it's
> much simpler to either (a) reboot, or (b) rmmod iwlagn and then
> modprobe iwlagn.
>
> I also don't know if it's a problem with (a) the iwlagn driver, (b) my
> hardware, (c) the network-manager WPA code, or (d) the enterprise AP
> that we are using, or some combination of the four. On my todo list
> is to get a completely different 802.11abn wireless PC Card, and then
> try to see if the problem reproduces itself there, and then see if I
> can at some point try to set aside a full week where I'd do nothing
> else with my laptop but git bisects full-time.
>
> Sometimes, git bisects are not terribly useful ways of trying to find
> the problem commits --- and I've tried doing them before to debug
> iwlagn problems twice before, and past experience tells me it's a
> minimum of 1, and usually more like 2 or 3 days of lost productivity
> while I try to debug it --- and that's when the problem is obvious
> within 10 or 20 minutes of the reboot. :-(
iwlwifi has a debug module option which generates a ton of spew, but
the Intel developers have managed to diagnose several iwlwifi problems
I've had by staring at the dumps. Starting there is probably going to
be faster than bisecting. (Especially when you're in a situation like I was
where it was just 'differently broken' at various points in time).
Dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-11 20:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-30 1:17 iwlagn (3.3-wl), the saga continuous Norbert Preining
2012-04-11 2:37 ` 3.4-rc2, ilwagn still most of the time completely unusable Norbert Preining
2012-04-11 2:54 ` David Miller
2012-04-11 18:40 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-04-11 20:01 ` Dave Jones [this message]
2012-04-11 23:01 ` Norbert Preining
2012-04-11 23:24 ` Venkataraman, Meenakshi
2012-04-12 0:02 ` Norbert Preining
2012-04-13 1:32 ` Venkataraman, Meenakshi
2012-04-13 1:40 ` Norbert Preining
[not found] ` <59083F8344AE164EB150C0518405C0680E0F285C@FMSMSX107.amr.corp.intel.com>
2012-06-28 7:25 ` Norbert Preining
2012-06-28 7:51 ` [Ilw] " Johannes Berg
2012-06-28 8:16 ` Norbert Preining
2012-07-03 19:35 ` Alessandro Suardi
2012-07-12 8:14 ` Norbert Preining
2012-07-12 16:16 ` Johannes Berg
2012-07-25 3:07 ` Norbert Preining
2012-04-13 5:38 ` Norbert Preining
2012-04-25 1:06 ` Venkataraman, Meenakshi
2012-04-26 0:51 ` Norbert Preining
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120411200105.GA22002@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=egrumbach@gmail.com \
--cc=ilw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ipw3945-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=preining@logic.at \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).