From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/8] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:53:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120416205317.GD3959@thinkpad-t410> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F8C841F.3030908@broadcom.com>
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:42:07PM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> >I've attempted to maintain the same high-level behavior that the
> >brcmsmac internal regulatory support currently enforces. I find a couple
> >of these to be questionable however, those being: the setting of the
> >radio disable state based on whether or not there are any channels
> >allowed by regulatory, and the handling of enabling/disabling OFDM.
> >Perhaps you can comment on whether or not these actions are needed.
>
> Regarding questionable things, you mean the transmit mute or is
> there another radio disable that I have not found yet. I only recall
> that channel 14 (JP only) does not allow OFDM so it may be to
> accommodate that. It may not be explicitly needed as mac80211
> provides the rate and/or modulation to use for the transmit frame.
I'm referring to radio_disabled in struct brcms_pub, specifically to the
setting and clearing of the WL_RADIO_COUNTRY_DISABLE bit in this field.
Patch 5 in the series deals specifically with this functionality.
Btw, I restored setting the transmit mute for passive channels in this
series, which I had to remove in earlier versions of these changes. Your
patch to enable tx after seeing a beacon fixed the issue I was seeing.
> >So far these changes are testing well on a MacBook Air 4,1 with BCM43224
> >wireless. I'm now able to see and associate with my AP on channel 52,
> >which was not possible previously.
>
> I will try to organize some regulatory testing over here with your patches.
Great, thanks!
Seth
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-16 20:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-16 20:17 [RFC PATCH 0/8] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support Seth Forshee
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] brcm80211: smac: don't set up tx power limits during initialization Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:32 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] brcm80211: smac: always set channel specified by mac80211 Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:32 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] brcm80211: smac: clean up channel.c Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:33 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-26 17:17 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-27 11:51 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-27 11:53 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-29 12:46 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-29 13:03 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 4/8] brcm80211: smac: inform mac80211 of the X2 regulatory domain Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:33 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-26 17:18 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-27 12:17 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-29 13:12 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-29 16:44 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-31 14:46 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-31 17:49 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-06-07 18:18 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] brcm80211: smac: enable/disable radio on regulatory updates Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:33 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-26 17:18 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-27 12:18 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] brcm80211: smac: use mac80211 channel data for tx power limits Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:33 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] brcm80211: smac: don't validate channels against internal regulatory data Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:33 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:17 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] brcm80211: smac: use current regulatory domain when checking whether OFDM is allowed Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:34 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:42 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] brcm80211: smac: rework regulatory support Arend van Spriel
2012-04-16 20:53 ` Seth Forshee [this message]
2012-04-19 19:31 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-04-19 19:46 ` Seth Forshee
2012-04-30 17:12 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-01 12:13 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-01 16:12 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-25 22:31 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-25 22:51 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-05-26 6:38 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-26 7:19 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2012-05-26 17:17 ` Seth Forshee
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120416205317.GD3959@thinkpad-t410 \
--to=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rodrigue@qca.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).