From: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
To: Arend van Spriel <arend@broadcom.com>
Cc: Camaleón <noelamac@gmail.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"sgruszka@redhat.com" <sgruszka@redhat.com>,
"Seth Forshee" <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: brcmsmac still woes, possible regression?
Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 05:29:26 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120509102926.GD3499@burratino> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FAA45AF.8050201@broadcom.com>
Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 05/09/2012 11:41 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Any news? If there's a patch that goes in the right direction with
>> known problems I'd still be interested in it, among other reasons
>> because it would make the bug more concrete and make it easier to
>> think about possible fixes.
>
> Well, there is the short term fix, which is already upstream and moved
> to stable. The long term fix for which Seth Forshee (Canonical) did a
> great job is reviewed over here, but it involves regulatory related code
> so it needs discussions with our compliance team and supervisor. So that
> causes some lag time.
>
> If you are using a kernel with the short term fix included please sent
> any logging information if the problem still persists.
Thanks for explaining. That makes sense.
Is the short term fix badc4f07622f ("brcm80211: smac: resume transmit
fifo upon receiving frames", 2012-04-11)?
Thanks,
Jonathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-09 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-24 8:55 brcmsmac still woes, possible regression? Camaleón
2012-03-24 9:27 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-03-24 10:04 ` Camaleón
2012-03-24 11:21 ` Camaleón
2012-03-26 9:23 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-03-26 9:43 ` Camaleón
2012-03-26 10:10 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-03-26 21:28 ` Camaleón
2012-03-27 8:47 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-03-28 11:19 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-03-28 11:26 ` Camaleón
2012-03-28 12:23 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-03-28 21:59 ` Camaleón
2012-03-29 11:56 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-03-29 13:38 ` Camaleón
2012-04-02 13:29 ` Camaleón
2012-04-02 21:50 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-04-03 6:25 ` Camaleón
2012-04-03 15:30 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-09 9:41 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-05-09 10:23 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-09 10:29 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2012-05-09 10:32 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-09 17:41 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-09 18:01 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-05-09 18:10 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-10 16:35 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-11 9:32 ` Johannes Berg
2012-05-11 17:31 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-16 20:15 ` Seth Forshee
2012-05-29 7:16 ` Johannes Berg
2012-03-26 14:32 ` Seth Forshee
2012-03-26 16:54 ` Arend van Spriel
2012-03-26 17:13 ` Seth Forshee
2012-03-26 17:15 ` Arend van Spriel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120509102926.GD3499@burratino \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=arend@broadcom.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noelamac@gmail.com \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
--cc=sgruszka@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox