From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:40817 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964860Ab2EOSPi (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 May 2012 14:15:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 14:14:23 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <20120515.141423.885518974251878746.davem@davemloft.net> (sfid-20120515_201610_039183_3549A810) To: joe@perches.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-decnet-user@lists.sourceforge.net, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter@vger.kernel.org, coreteam@netfilter.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, dev@openvswitch.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 0/2] net: Use net__ratelimit From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1337104765.7050.24.camel@joe2Laptop> References: <20120515.134531.530903973750646107.davem@davemloft.net> <1337104765.7050.24.camel@joe2Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Joe Perches Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 10:59:25 -0700 > I could produce a net_printk_ratelimited that would keep > the original behavior if necessary. > > net_printk_ratelimited(KERN_DEBUG etc...) I don't think it's worth the hassle, we'd rather get people into the habit of using dynamic_debug.