From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from youngberry.canonical.com ([91.189.89.112]:56871 "EHLO youngberry.canonical.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752951Ab2FMNqx (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 09:46:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:46:51 -0500 From: Seth Forshee To: Arend van Spriel Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Brett Rudley , Roland Vossen , "Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" , Kan Yan , Pieter-Paul Giesberts , "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] brcm80211: smac: use mac80211 channel data for tx power limits Message-ID: <20120613134651.GB3490@thinkpad-t410> (sfid-20120613_154656_987925_08FDF630) References: <1338906849-26135-1-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com> <1338906849-26135-8-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com> <4FD85FE3.3090604@broadcom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <4FD85FE3.3090604@broadcom.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:39:47AM +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 06/05/2012 04:34 PM, Seth Forshee wrote: > > Currently the limits from the internal X2 domain are used, regardless > > of what regulatory rules are in effect. Instead use the power limits set > > by the higher-level regulatory support. > > > > The rules for the MIMO power limits are still always derived from the > > world domain. Guidance from Broadcom is needed on how these limits > > should be determined for other regulatory domains. > > Have not got definite answer yet. Luis indicated that Qualcomm/Atheros > had similar construct, but that is was not really needed and could be > derived. I will have to follow up on it in a separate patch. Thanks, that confirms my understanding of the state of things from previous discussion. Would you like me to modify that statement in some way? Or was your comment purely informational? Reading it again, I probably will at least add a comment to indicate that the state of things is workable for now and will be improved later.