From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49385 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755846Ab2GJNhR (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jul 2012 09:37:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 15:37:09 +0200 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: Emmanuel Grumbach Cc: Johannes Berg , Intel Linux Wireless , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RHEL6 PATCH] iwlwifi: remove spurious warning Message-ID: <20120710133708.GC2260@redhat.com> (sfid-20120710_153725_858846_15E4DE5F) References: <1341834509-11601-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <1341834647.4455.32.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net> <20120709115423.GE2438@redhat.com> <20120710060211.GA2260@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 04:15:09PM +0300, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote: > Emmanuel Grumbach > egrumbach@gmail.com > > > On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 10:10:38PM +0300, Emmanuel Grumbach wrote: > >> I would be glad to know on what commands this WARN_ON triggers > >> though... The command name should be printed along with the WARN_ON. > > > > REPLY_RX_PHY_CMD > > > > Ok thanks. This comes from the fw for every HT frame received in 4965. > Do you see that the WARNING triggers for every HT frame Rx? > I don't mind removing that code anyway, I was just asking to > understand what happens :-) I did not hit that. It was raported for iwl1000 on RHEL6.3: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837754 Stanislaw