From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Christopher Sacchi <chris.sacchi@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]: Autosleep patch.
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2012 04:07:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120807110748.GA12534@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <501FE4E9.3080004@xenotime.net>
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 08:38:17AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 08/06/2012 08:13 AM, Christopher Sacchi wrote:
>
> > This patch (listed below), changes an old function in autosleep.c in
> > kernel version 3.5. It's code is listed from the first -- line to the
> > 2nd to last -- line.
> > This patch was checked with checkpatch.pl with no errors:
> > --
> > --- power/autosleep.c 2012-07-21 20:58:29.000000000 +0000
> > +++ power/autosleepnew.c 2012-08-06 10:52:26.000000000 +0000
>
>
> The file names should include the full path from the top level of the
> kernel source tree. E.g.:
>
> --- linux.orig/kernel/power/autosleep.c
> +++ linux/kernel/power/autosleep.c
>
> This patch uses the name autosleepnew.c, which is not what is
> required/expected.
>
> Your previous patches were for wireless (mac80211) components, so they
> needed to go to the linux-wireless mailing list. This patch is not
> about wireless, so don't send it to that mailing list, although you
> could send it to the linux-pm@vger.kernel.org mailing list.
> Please see the MAINTAINERS file for where to send patches.
>
>
> > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static void try_to_suspend(struct work_s
> > if (!pm_get_wakeup_count(&initial_count, true))
> > goto out;
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&autosleep_lock);
> > + mutex_lock_interruptable();
> >
Plus, this code obviously never compiled. Nor does the submitter ever explain
what he actually tries to accomplish.
Guenter
> > if (!pm_save_wakeup_count(initial_count)) {
> > mutex_unlock(&autosleep_lock);
> > Signed-off-by: Christopher P. Sacchi <chris.sacchi@gmail.com>
> > --
>
> Signed-off-by: line is not part of the patch. It should be near the
> end of the patch description, before the actual patch.
>
> Again, please read and follow Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
>
> thanks.
>
> --
> ~Randy
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-07 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-06 15:13 [PATCH]: Autosleep patch Christopher Sacchi
2012-08-06 15:38 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-08-07 11:07 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2012-08-07 11:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120807110748.GA12534@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=chris.sacchi@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).