From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:28537 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752377Ab2JOPiw (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2012 11:38:52 -0400 Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 17:37:53 +0200 From: Stanislaw Gruszka To: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" Cc: Johannes Berg , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" , Intel Linux Wireless Subject: Re: Lots of trans->state != IWL_TRANS_FW_ALIVE warnings Message-ID: <20121015153752.GE12560@redhat.com> (sfid-20121015_173855_787425_AFE0250F) References: <20121015144722.GA12560@redhat.com> <0BA3FCBA62E2DC44AF3030971E174FB3B7D4BB@HASMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com> <20121015152336.GC12560@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20121015152336.GC12560@redhat.com> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 05:23:36PM +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 03:14:51PM +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote: > > > I glanced at the bugs and I can only see the trace dump. I am pretty sure > > > there is an issue before the dump - fw assert of something like that. Can it be > > > possible to get the full log? > > > > > > > Can you ask people to try the attached patch? > > This will let us know where the fw is brought down. > > Yes, I'll build kernel with that patch and request for test and dmesg. debug=0x400 is enough or do you want also some other flags? Stanislaw