linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] carl9170: remove unneeded NULL check
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 14:49:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201212021449.21267.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121202104238.GB16078@elgon.mountain>

On Sunday 02 December 2012 11:42:38 Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The "sta" variable is not checked for NULL consistently and it makes the
> static checkers complain.  I asked Christian Lamparter about this and
> it turns out the check is not needed.  "In fact, in order to set up a
> ampdu session, the stack would call the driver's op_ampdu_action
> callback which always needs a station."

that would be from the thread:
<http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg94526.html>
 
> I have removed the check.
I think this will bug for multicast and injected frames.
 
It is not possible for the sta(tion) pointer to be NULL if
the frame has the IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU flag set. So the
sta == NULL check can be avoided when calling 
carl9170_tx_ampdu_queue. This is because mac80211 tracks
all aggregation sessions within the station struct.
Of course, this is something that the checker tool can't
possibly deduce, but it has a point and we can add a check
like this [see attached draft patch]:

What do you think [or more to the point: what does the
checker say?]

Regards,
	Chr
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c
index 84377cf..e09d293 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c
@@ -1470,6 +1470,9 @@ void carl9170_op_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
 
 	info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
 
+	if ((info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU) && WARN_ON_ONCE(!sta))
+		goto err_free;
+
 	if (unlikely(carl9170_tx_prepare(ar, sta, skb)))
 		goto err_free;
 


  reply	other threads:[~2012-12-02 13:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-12-02 10:42 [patch] carl9170: remove unneeded NULL check Dan Carpenter
2012-12-02 13:49 ` Christian Lamparter [this message]
2012-12-02 16:51   ` Dan Carpenter
2012-12-02 20:24     ` Christian Lamparter
2012-12-02 22:17       ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201212021449.21267.chunkeey@googlemail.com \
    --to=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
    --cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).