From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] carl9170: remove unneeded NULL check
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 14:49:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201212021449.21267.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121202104238.GB16078@elgon.mountain>
On Sunday 02 December 2012 11:42:38 Dan Carpenter wrote:
> The "sta" variable is not checked for NULL consistently and it makes the
> static checkers complain. I asked Christian Lamparter about this and
> it turns out the check is not needed. "In fact, in order to set up a
> ampdu session, the stack would call the driver's op_ampdu_action
> callback which always needs a station."
that would be from the thread:
<http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg94526.html>
> I have removed the check.
I think this will bug for multicast and injected frames.
It is not possible for the sta(tion) pointer to be NULL if
the frame has the IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU flag set. So the
sta == NULL check can be avoided when calling
carl9170_tx_ampdu_queue. This is because mac80211 tracks
all aggregation sessions within the station struct.
Of course, this is something that the checker tool can't
possibly deduce, but it has a point and we can add a check
like this [see attached draft patch]:
What do you think [or more to the point: what does the
checker say?]
Regards,
Chr
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c
index 84377cf..e09d293 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/carl9170/tx.c
@@ -1470,6 +1470,9 @@ void carl9170_op_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
info = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(skb);
+ if ((info->flags & IEEE80211_TX_CTL_AMPDU) && WARN_ON_ONCE(!sta))
+ goto err_free;
+
if (unlikely(carl9170_tx_prepare(ar, sta, skb)))
goto err_free;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-02 13:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-02 10:42 [patch] carl9170: remove unneeded NULL check Dan Carpenter
2012-12-02 13:49 ` Christian Lamparter [this message]
2012-12-02 16:51 ` Dan Carpenter
2012-12-02 20:24 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-12-02 22:17 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201212021449.21267.chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--to=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).