From: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
To: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>
Cc: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] p54: zero-out rx_status
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:08:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201212111608.43293.chunkeey@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1355234105-12013-3-git-send-email-juhosg@openwrt.org>
On Tuesday, December 11, 2012 02:55:05 PM Gabor Juhos wrote:
> In commit 'mac80211: support radiotap vendor namespace RX data'
> new fields were added to 'struct ieee80211_rx_status'.
> The ath5k driver does not initializes those fields and
^^^^^ p54?!
> this can cause unexpected behaviour. The patch ensures
> that each field gets initialized with zeroes.
Actually, when the skb is alloced/initialized by
__alloc_skb, the skb->cb is already zeroed (which
is where the ieee80211_rx_status will be stored).
And while p54 recycles command response skbs, the
driver does not touch the skb->cb of 802.11 skbs,
until the frame is destined for ieee80211_rx_irqsave.
If this issue just popped up now, I suspect that
something else is silently corrupting our SKBs
[or can anybody see how rt2x00 hit this issue?]
> Cc: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <juhosg@openwrt.org>
> ---
> Compile tested only.
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/p54/txrx.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/p54/txrx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/p54/txrx.c
> index 12f0a34..be2552e 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/p54/txrx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/p54/txrx.c
> @@ -345,6 +345,8 @@ static int p54_rx_data(struct p54_common *priv, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (!(hdr->flags & cpu_to_le16(P54_HDR_FLAG_DATA_IN_FCS_GOOD)))
> return 0;
>
> + memset(rx_status, 0, sizeof(*rx_status));
> +
> if (hdr->decrypt_status == P54_DECRYPT_OK)
> rx_status->flag |= RX_FLAG_DECRYPTED;
> if ((hdr->decrypt_status == P54_DECRYPT_FAIL_MICHAEL) ||
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-11 15:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-11 13:55 [PATCH 1/3] rt2x00: zero-out rx_status Gabor Juhos
2012-12-11 13:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] ath5k: " Gabor Juhos
2012-12-11 13:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] p54: " Gabor Juhos
2012-12-11 15:08 ` Christian Lamparter [this message]
2012-12-11 15:25 ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-11 15:30 ` Johannes Berg
2012-12-11 15:38 ` Christian Lamparter
2012-12-11 17:19 ` Gabor Juhos
2012-12-11 17:16 ` Gabor Juhos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201212111608.43293.chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--to=chunkeey@googlemail.com \
--cc=juhosg@openwrt.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=users@rt2x00.serialmonkey.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).