linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karl Beldan <karl.beldan@gmail.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	Karl Beldan <karl.beldan@rivierawaves.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mac80211: get the rates masks from the txrc in rate_control_get_rate
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 00:06:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130310230600.GC3824@gobelin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <513D08B5.1030007@openwrt.org>

On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 11:27:01PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2013-03-10 11:16 PM, Karl Beldan wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 02:29:11PM +0100, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> >> On 2013-03-04 9:45 PM, john wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:12:04PM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> >> >> On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 19:27 +0100, Karl Beldan wrote:
> >> >> > From: Karl Beldan <karl.beldan@rivierawaves.com>
> >> >> > 
> >> >> > Currently it gets it from the sdata. This uses and updates the ad-hoc
> >> >> > masks of the ieee80211_tx_rate_control instead of copying them.
> >> >> 
> >> >> Is there any need to update them?
> >> >> 
> >> >> The change for "mask" seems to make it less efficient since it could
> >> >> otherwise be put into a register.
> >> >> 
> >> > Totally, this commit spares the 10bytes copy of mcs_mask but adds a less
> >> > efficient indirection to mask.
> >> > I thought of it but kept the symmetry with mcs_mask.
> >> > Apparently you wouldn't mind the dissymmetry so I will re-send using mask
> >> > by value, plus I wrote "updates .." where it is more like "lets the
> >> > ad-hoc masks get overwritten".
> >> It seems to me that all of this could be made more efficient by default
> >> if a mcs mask pointer is only passed to rate control if the user
> >> actually configured a MCS mask. Also, filtering out rates from the mask
> >> that the sta does not support seems a bit unnecessary, since the rate
> >> control usually looks at the HT capabilities and the sta's mcs rx mask
> >> anyway.
> >> 
> > Filtering is necessary to lookup alternative downgrade/upgrade rates.
> Right, but the code could be changed to only do the filtering if
> mac80211 needs to look up an alternative downgrade/upgrade rate.
> 
With this I agree.
Do you have strong opinions wrt basic rates ? The current code might tx
mc/bc with non-basic rates.

 
Karl

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-10 23:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-04 18:27 [PATCH v2 1/2] mac80211: get the rates masks from the txrc in rate_control_get_rate Karl Beldan
2013-03-04 18:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mac80211: fix the check for mcs rates masking Karl Beldan
2013-03-04 20:13   ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-04 20:51     ` john
2013-03-04 20:12 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mac80211: get the rates masks from the txrc in rate_control_get_rate Johannes Berg
2013-03-04 20:45   ` john
2013-03-05 13:29     ` Felix Fietkau
2013-03-05 16:10       ` Karl Beldan
2013-03-05 18:53         ` Johannes Berg
2013-03-05 22:27           ` john
2013-03-10 22:35             ` Karl Beldan
2013-03-10 22:16       ` Karl Beldan
2013-03-10 22:27         ` Felix Fietkau
2013-03-10 23:06           ` Karl Beldan [this message]
2013-03-10 23:33             ` Felix Fietkau
2013-03-15 15:46             ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130310230600.GC3824@gobelin \
    --to=karl.beldan@gmail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=karl.beldan@rivierawaves.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@openwrt.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).