linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@open-mesh.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Helmut Schaa <helmut.schaa@googlemail.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cfg80211: add get_max_tp() API
Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 13:34:06 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130409113406.GC3771@open-mesh.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1365503108.8465.34.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1504 bytes --]

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 03:25:08 -0700, Johannes Berg wrote:
> 
> > But the reported_rate field would just contain the index of the selected rate,
> > not the throughput. As far as I can tell the latter is an RC private information
> > (it not exported anywhere outside of the RC algorithm) and that is why I made
> > this API which would directly talk to minstrel and get this value.
> 
> Actually it would contain the entire rate configuration.
> 
> Anyway my concern is that you're adding something that's rather minstrel
> specific. It's not really usable by any other algorithm, you're
> reporting minstrel's estimation of the throughput. If you report the
> current "best" rate, that'll probably get you pretty much the same
> behaviour overall, but be more portable to other algorithms I think.

I understand your concern. My guess was that every algorithm was "somehow" able
to provide such measurement. The point is that the throughput value is computed
so that it also take probability of success into consideration.
This means that two nodes using the same rate may have different throughputs
(and this is important when building our distributed metric).

However, nothing prevents any algorithm to implement the API the way it can do.
I've not looked into other RC implementations yet, but I guess they would have a
similar value to return too?

Cheers,

> 
> johannes
> 

-- 
Antonio Quartulli

..each of us alone is worth nothing..
Ernesto "Che" Guevara

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-09 11:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-04 19:57 [PATCH 1/3] cfg80211: add get_max_tp() API Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-04 19:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] mac80211: add rate_control_ops::get_max_tp() and implement it Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-04 19:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] mac80211: implement cfg80211_ops::get_max_tp() API Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-05  8:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] cfg80211: add get_max_tp() API Helmut Schaa
2013-04-05  8:39   ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-05 13:20     ` Johannes Berg
2013-04-06  7:33       ` Antonio Quartulli
2013-04-09 10:25         ` Johannes Berg
2013-04-09 11:34           ` Antonio Quartulli [this message]
2013-04-11  9:56             ` Johannes Berg
2013-04-11  9:57               ` Johannes Berg
2013-04-12 14:10                 ` Antonio Quartulli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130409113406.GC3771@open-mesh.com \
    --to=antonio@open-mesh.com \
    --cc=helmut.schaa@googlemail.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).