From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Bob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: use synchronize_rcu() with rcu_barrier()
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:20:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130418222017.GF3479@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130418220443.GB3759@localhost>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 06:04:43PM -0400, Bob Copeland wrote:
> The RCU docs used to state that rcu_barrier() included a wait
> for an RCU grace period; however the comments for rcu_barrier()
> as of commit f0a0e6f... "rcu: Clarify memory-ordering properties
> of grace-period primitives" contradict this.
>
> So add back synchronize_{rcu,net}() to where they once were,
> but keep the rcu_barrier()s for the call_rcu() callbacks.
>
> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bob Copeland <bob@cozybit.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> net/mac80211/iface.c | 5 +++--
> net/mac80211/pm.c | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/iface.c b/net/mac80211/iface.c
> index b6abaaa..c634aff 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/iface.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/iface.c
> @@ -836,11 +836,12 @@ static void ieee80211_do_stop(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
> *
> * sta_info_flush_cleanup() requires rcu_barrier()
> * first to wait for the station call_rcu() calls
> - * to complete, here we need at least sychronize_rcu()
> - * it to wait for the RX path in case it is using the
> + * to complete, and we also need synchronize_rcu()
> + * to wait for the RX path in case it is using the
> * interface and enqueuing frames at this very time on
> * another CPU.
> */
> + synchronize_rcu();
> rcu_barrier();
> sta_info_flush_cleanup(sdata);
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/pm.c b/net/mac80211/pm.c
> index 4431f0f..7fc5d0d 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/pm.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/pm.c
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ int __ieee80211_suspend(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct cfg80211_wowlan *wowlan)
> IEEE80211_QUEUE_STOP_REASON_SUSPEND);
>
> /* flush out all packets and station cleanup call_rcu()s */
> + synchronize_net();
> rcu_barrier();
>
> ieee80211_flush_queues(local, NULL);
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
> --
> Bob Copeland %% www.bobcopeland.com
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-18 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-18 22:04 [PATCH] mac80211: use synchronize_rcu() with rcu_barrier() Bob Copeland
2013-04-18 22:20 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2013-04-18 22:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Bob Copeland
2013-04-22 13:41 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130418222017.GF3479@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@bobcopeland.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).