From: Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3
Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 14:38:03 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130505143803.7e46e4c6@chukar.edge2.net> (raw)
After building 3.9 for my HP/Compaq 2510p laptop, the wireless (iwl4965)
would seemingly no longer connect. Actually, it seems that it *will*
eventually, where that is somewhere between 4 and 21+ retries (from KDE
network manager). Going back to 3.8 (and earlier) and the problem goes
away. (All on Fedora 18, fwiw, but I don't think that's significant).
I bisected the problem to:
commit 1672c0e31917f49d31d30d79067103432bc20cc7
Author: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Date: Tue Jan 29 15:02:27 2013 +0100
mac80211: start auth/assoc timeout on frame status
but I can't (easily) revert that in 3.9 (maybe I can in -rc1 or
something? haven't tried that)
What more information is needed from me? I may still mess around with
trying to revert that patch just to nail it down for sure, but two
separate bisection exercises ended up at the same place.
There are a few traps for the unwary if anyone else ends up bisecting
in through here -- the first bisection (3.8 - 3.9-rc1) ran into an IPv6
build error along the way, which I "fixed" by configuring it out --
also, the amount of retries goes from *many* (15-21+) to relatively few
(4) somewhere in there, which confused me and led to the second
bisection (3.8-3.9) ...
jake
--
Jake Edge - LWN - jake@lwn.net - http://lwn.net
next reply other threads:[~2013-05-05 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-05 20:38 Jake Edge [this message]
2013-05-06 12:38 ` Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3 Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-06 14:37 ` Jake Edge
2013-05-06 15:30 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-06 15:31 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:44 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-07 8:42 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-07 8:46 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2013-05-07 13:53 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-07 15:35 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-07 16:07 ` [PATCH 3.10] iwl4965: workaround connection regression on passive channel Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-22 11:59 ` Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3 Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-24 20:28 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:11 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:21 ` Jake Edge
2013-05-06 15:24 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:29 ` Jake Edge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130505143803.7e46e4c6@chukar.edge2.net \
--to=jake@lwn.net \
--cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).