linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3
Date: Sun, 5 May 2013 14:38:03 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130505143803.7e46e4c6@chukar.edge2.net> (raw)


After building 3.9 for my HP/Compaq 2510p laptop, the wireless (iwl4965)
would seemingly no longer connect.  Actually, it seems that it *will*
eventually, where that is somewhere between 4 and 21+ retries (from KDE
network manager).  Going back to 3.8 (and earlier) and the problem goes
away.  (All on Fedora 18, fwiw, but I don't think that's significant).

I bisected the problem to:

commit 1672c0e31917f49d31d30d79067103432bc20cc7
Author: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Date:   Tue Jan 29 15:02:27 2013 +0100

    mac80211: start auth/assoc timeout on frame status

but I can't (easily) revert that in 3.9 (maybe I can in -rc1 or
something?  haven't tried that)

What more information is needed from me?  I may still mess around with
trying to revert that patch just to nail it down for sure, but two
separate bisection exercises ended up at the same place.

There are a few traps for the unwary if anyone else ends up bisecting
in through here -- the first bisection (3.8 - 3.9-rc1) ran into an IPv6
build error along the way, which I "fixed" by configuring it out --
also, the amount of retries goes from *many* (15-21+) to relatively few
(4) somewhere in there, which confused me and led to the second
bisection (3.8-3.9) ...

jake

-- 
Jake Edge - LWN - jake@lwn.net - http://lwn.net

             reply	other threads:[~2013-05-05 20:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-05 20:38 Jake Edge [this message]
2013-05-06 12:38 ` Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3 Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-06 14:37   ` Jake Edge
2013-05-06 15:30     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-06 15:31       ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:44         ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-07  8:42           ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-07  8:46             ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2013-05-07 13:53             ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-07 15:35               ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-07 16:07                 ` [PATCH 3.10] iwl4965: workaround connection regression on passive channel Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-22 11:59                 ` Bisected 3.9 regression for iwl4965 connection problem to 1672c0e3 Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-24 20:28                   ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:11 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:21   ` Jake Edge
2013-05-06 15:24     ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-06 15:29       ` Jake Edge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130505143803.7e46e4c6@chukar.edge2.net \
    --to=jake@lwn.net \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).