From: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
To: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Matt Chen <machen@suse.com>, joeyli <jlee@suse.com>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux summit this year ?
Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 11:42:36 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130507164236.GD32496@thinkpad-t410> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130503144947.GF2069@tuxdriver.com>
On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:49:47AM -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:11:10AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 15:43 -0400, John W. Linville wrote:
> >
> > > "I'm confirming that we got the space you needed for the Wireless Summit in
> > > New Orleans.
> >
> > > Does that sound alright to everyone?
> >
> > Sounds good to me. If it overlaps LPC, which one are people going to
> > have to register for (if not going to both anyway)?
>
> I would presume that if you want to got to LPC sessions then you
> would have to register for LPC. Generally we have required Wireless
> Summit attendees to register for LinuxCon, and I presume that would
> be required this time (so both LinuxCon and LPC if you want the
> LPC sessions).
Why require LinuxCon registration rather than LPC? I'd assume most
wireless summit attendees are more interested in plumbers than LinuxCon.
Could the summit just require registration at one or the other?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-07 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CALx5=V-wOkHb1Q4A_32LBQm9aP0dUL1J5s4ceLwqVGSYhfpwxw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-02-25 14:32 ` Linux summit this year ? John W. Linville
2013-02-25 16:29 ` Marcel Holtmann
2013-02-25 18:34 ` Larry Finger
2013-02-25 21:12 ` John W. Linville
2013-02-25 23:27 ` John W. Linville
2013-02-26 15:21 ` Marcel Holtmann
2013-05-02 19:27 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-02 19:43 ` John W. Linville
2013-05-03 8:11 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-03 14:49 ` John W. Linville
2013-05-03 14:52 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-04 21:28 ` Arend van Spriel
2013-05-05 12:26 ` John W. Linville
2013-05-07 16:42 ` Seth Forshee [this message]
2013-05-07 17:44 ` John W. Linville
2013-05-08 13:20 ` Seth Forshee
2013-05-08 15:09 ` John W. Linville
[not found] ` <CALx5=V_4LOmZ=dkhtKmZ3FdgzEq6t4jSBogzoPn+KyFTBZ6Zvw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-05-13 14:07 ` John W. Linville
2013-05-07 18:30 ` Marcel Holtmann
2013-03-04 15:53 ` Johannes Berg
2013-05-22 17:18 ` Linux wireless summit, 19-20 September 2013 in New Orleans! John W. Linville
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130507164236.GD32496@thinkpad-t410 \
--to=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=machen@suse.com \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).