From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Jake Edge <jake@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [RFT/RFC 0/4] iwlegacy: workaround for firmware frame tx rejection
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 10:53:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130525085259.GB1599@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369427208.8290.35.camel@jlt4.sipsolutions.net>
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:26:48PM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-05-23 at 14:20 +0200, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > Jake, please test this set and check if it not cause association
> > problems you reported earlier this month.
> >
> > Please apply it together with this mac80211 patch:
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-wireless&m=136879090123023&w=2
> > which I already posted and is queued to upstream. Not having
> > it may cause troubles and influence negatively this set test.
> >
> > Johannes, is need to check beacon bssid or even if rx frame
> > is a beacon to unblock queues? I think if we receive any frame
> > (not necessary beacon or our bssid beacon) on passive channel,
> > that mean we can use that channel. But that depend how firmware
> > is implemented, if firmware require our bssid beacon to unblock
> > channel, driver of course need that too.
>
> I _think_ any frame with good CRC will do, but I'm not entirely sure for
> 3945/4965.
I prefer to unblock queues on any frame, as this allow to start
operating quickly. Let's see if this will also work on Jake environment,
I'll add patch 5/4 which implement that.
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-25 8:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-23 12:20 [RFT/RFC 0/4] iwlegacy: workaround for firmware frame tx rejection Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-23 12:20 ` [RFT/RFC 1/4] iwlegacy: small refactoring of il_{stop,wake}_queue Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-23 12:20 ` [RFT/RFC 2/4] iwlegacy: add il_{stop,wake}_queues_by_reason functions Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-23 12:20 ` [RFT/RFC 3/4] iwlegacy: workaround for firmware frame tx rejection Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-23 12:21 ` [RFT/RFC 4/4] Revert "iwl4965: workaround connection regression on passive channel" Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-25 8:55 ` [RFT/RFC 5/4] iwlegacy: unblock queues on passive channel if any frame receive Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-05-24 20:26 ` [RFT/RFC 0/4] iwlegacy: workaround for firmware frame tx rejection Johannes Berg
2013-05-25 8:53 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2013-05-24 23:18 ` Jake Edge
2013-05-25 6:49 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-06-10 20:38 ` Jake Edge
2013-06-11 3:41 ` Jake Edge
2013-06-11 16:09 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-06-11 19:17 ` Jake Edge
2013-06-12 14:39 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130525085259.GB1599@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=jake@lwn.net \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).