linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* cw1200 "sbus" conflicts with SPARC "sbus"
@ 2013-05-31  9:31 Geert Uytterhoeven
  2013-05-31 12:05 ` Solomon Peachy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Geert Uytterhoeven @ 2013-05-31  9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Solomon Peachy; +Cc: John W. Linville, linux-wireless, netdev


sparc64/allmodconfig:

drivers/net/wireless/cw1200/hwio.c:51:21: error: macro "sbus_memcpy_fromio" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3
drivers/net/wireless/cw1200/hwio.c:66:19: error: macro "sbus_memcpy_toio" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3

http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/8846508/

At first I thought it was a bad/old implementation of a real SPARC sbus
driver.  but it seems the two sbusses are completely unrelated.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: cw1200 "sbus" conflicts with SPARC "sbus"
  2013-05-31  9:31 cw1200 "sbus" conflicts with SPARC "sbus" Geert Uytterhoeven
@ 2013-05-31 12:05 ` Solomon Peachy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Solomon Peachy @ 2013-05-31 12:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Geert Uytterhoeven; +Cc: John W. Linville, linux-wireless, netdev

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 926 bytes --]

On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:31:05AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> 
> sparc64/allmodconfig:
> 
> drivers/net/wireless/cw1200/hwio.c:51:21: error: macro "sbus_memcpy_fromio" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3
> drivers/net/wireless/cw1200/hwio.c:66:19: error: macro "sbus_memcpy_toio" passed 4 arguments, but takes just 3
> 
> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/8846508/
> 
> At first I thought it was a bad/old implementation of a real SPARC sbus
> driver.  but it seems the two sbusses are completely unrelated.

Yikes. 

Would it be sufficient to just rename that pair of macros, or should I 
go and rename entire cw1200's "bus" subsystem?

Either way, I'll add this to the to-do list for the weekend.

 - Solomon
-- 
Solomon Peachy        		       pizza at shaftnet dot org	 
Delray Beach, FL                          ^^ (mail/jabber) ^^
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-05-31 12:06 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-05-31  9:31 cw1200 "sbus" conflicts with SPARC "sbus" Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-05-31 12:05 ` Solomon Peachy

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).