linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Pedro Francisco <pedrogfrancisco@gmail.com>
Cc: Tino Keitel <tino.keitel@tikei.de>,
	ML linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Power saving features for iwl4965
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 15:18:29 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130614131829.GA5125@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJZjf_zOF=qGEE=pWDRe0YDpAYophm93cVM8pfuL0sTRGq56EA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 01:50:58PM +0100, Pedro Francisco wrote:
> >> >> Could you try this experimental patch? (...)
> >> >
> >> > I am trying the iwlegacy powersave patch along with CPU scheduler BFS
> >> > and IO scheduler BFQ.
> >> >
> >> > I've got this today: (...)
> >> >
> >> > (...)
> >> I also got a SYSASSERT:
> >> (...)
> >>
> >> I disabled powersave (but kept running the same kernel) and none of
> >> the errors appeared again.
> >
> > Yes, this seems to be iwlegacy PS issue and has to be fixed before
> > this patch could be applied.
> 
> But is it a driver-only issue? I had assumed it was some sort of
> fireware+driver issue...
Looks like driver issue or firmware issue that can be workaround in 
the driver.

> Will running with debug on help? Or is it easily reproducible on any
> iwl3945 / iwl4465 ?
> 
> Because in my case (iwl3945) it happens after boot, no prior suspend
> to RAM is required to trigger the issues.
I can reproduce microcode error on iwl4965 by reloading modules. Looks
like we put device in sleep mode and it can not be properly booted when
driver initalize. I did not yet test patch on iwl3945. When I'll do
this, I think I'll be able to reproduce problems you discovered. If not
I'll ask for more debug info.

Thanks
Stanislaw

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-14 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-18 20:35 Power saving features for iwl4965 Tino Keitel
2012-04-19 14:25 ` Johannes Berg
2012-04-19 18:50   ` tino
2012-04-25 12:25 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2012-05-03 18:28   ` Tino Keitel
2012-12-26 18:54     ` Tino Keitel
2013-01-07 11:08       ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-01-08  1:48         ` Pedro Francisco
2013-01-08  8:47           ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-06-03  8:52         ` Tino Keitel
2013-06-03 14:18           ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-06-09  0:28             ` Pedro Francisco
2013-06-10 19:31               ` Pedro Francisco
2013-06-11 16:19                 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-06-11 18:55                   ` Tino Keitel
2013-06-14 12:50                   ` Pedro Francisco
2013-06-14 13:18                     ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2013-06-25 14:25                       ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-07-11 21:02                         ` Pedro Francisco
2013-07-16 10:27                           ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-07-16 11:02                             ` Pedro Francisco
2013-07-17 11:48                             ` Pedro Francisco
2013-07-31 12:08                               ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-08-04 14:24                                 ` Pedro Francisco
2013-08-04 14:53                                   ` Pedro Francisco
2013-10-17  9:06                                     ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-10-17 13:32                                       ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2013-06-11 18:51             ` Tino Keitel
2014-02-18 10:57               ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2014-02-18 11:32                 ` Emmanuel Grumbach
2014-02-18 11:59                   ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2014-02-20 12:08                 ` Pedro Francisco
2014-02-25 16:16                   ` Pedro Francisco
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-01 16:06 Tino Keitel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130614131829.GA5125@redhat.com \
    --to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pedrogfrancisco@gmail.com \
    --cc=tino.keitel@tikei.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).