From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56700 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752676Ab3JHJ6S (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Oct 2013 05:58:18 -0400 Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 11:57:58 +0200 From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer To: Dave Taht , John Linville , bloat-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Simon Barber , Anirudh Sivaraman Subject: Recommend a Wireless/WiFi chip, that best address bufferbloat Message-ID: <20131008115758.694477b7@redhat.com> (sfid-20131008_115829_454393_D53A72F3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi All, As Dave Taht repeats, we have not solved bufferbloat on Wifi, yet. I've been approached by some embedded developers, who need to choose some Wifi hardware for their device, and is concerned about bufferbloat. What do we recommend of Wifi chips? - Which ones are the least-bad regrading bufferbloat? - Which ones do we hope to solve in the near-future? -- Best regards, Jesper Dangaard Brouer MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer